首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2023-01-17
35
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection Modem scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp wedges, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams. Clams were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modem clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths—some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens—clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
The word "comet" underlined in Paragraph 3 refers to________.
选项
A、an event that could have obscured the geological record
B、a possible cause for the decline of brachiopods
C、massive ecological or geological changes
D、the acceleration of evolutionary adaptation
答案
B
解析
文中第3段最后两句提到,物种大规模死亡的可能原因之一是彗星掉落在地球上引发的,而腕足类数量减少则是大规模死亡其中一个后果,因此B项“是腕足类动物数量减少的一个可能原因”正确。C项“大型生态或地理变化”,这是在or之前与彗星并列的表述,两者不能互换。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/TNcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Skepticsofhighereducationoftencomplainthatuniversitiesoffertoomanyboringdegreeswithlittlevalueintheworkplace.【
ZoeBuhlerwasscheduledforanultrasoundappointmentontheSeptembermorningwhenAustralianpoliceenteredherhome.Thepre
AstudyinCyberpsychology,Behavior,andSocialNetworkingsuggeststhatartificialintelligenceholdsapromisingfutureinhe
Whilemanyworkersarewillingtolearnnewskillsorcompletelyretraintoimprovetheirfutureemployability,fewfeeltheyar
Whilemanyworkersarewillingtolearnnewskillsorcompletelyretraintoimprovetheirfutureemployability,fewfeeltheyar
TheUnitedStatesiswidelyrecognizedtohaveaprivateeconomybecauseprivatelyownedbusinessesplay【C1】________roles.TheA
Forty-threepercentofAmericanssaytheyaretootiredtofunction.So,somemornings,youmighteven【C1】________stayinginbed
[A]Uniqueness[B]Attentiveness[C]Communication[D]Personalization[E]Appreciation[F]Recognitio
Iftelevisionprogramsdidnotfeaturecriminals,they________resultinincreasedviolenceinsociety.
就餐时,围桌共食是中国人的一种传统。与西方人把鲜花放餐桌中央不同的是,中国人把菜肴放餐桌中央供大家一起享用。这种风俗体现了食物在中华文明史上的重要地位。更重要的是,这种方式促进了就餐者之间的交流。通常在一餐饭之后,朋友之间的关系更加紧密,生意合作伙伴也加深
随机试题
养殖企业通过收购饲料企业股权的方式实现对其控制,属于哪一种战略()
组织的平均声波衰减最低的是
女性,26岁。2个月前出现左下腹痛、腹泻,排黏液脓血便,每日4~6次,排便后腹痛缓解。四肢关节疼痛。查体;腹软,腹部未及包块,左下腹压痛。可能的诊断是
有一名叫冬冬的3岁男孩,上午在家玩耍时突然开始频繁呛咳,后发生面部青紫,医生首先要考虑是
女,30岁,因甲状腺大部切除术,术后发音时音调低顿,但饮水时并不出现误咽、呛咳,可能是术中损伤了
下列选项中,不属于合同权利特征的是()。
关于吊顶工程,下列哪条表述不完全符合规范规定?[1998年第091题][1999年第097题][2000年第097题][2003年第093题][2004年第096题][2007年第094题]
钢筋混凝土连续板的受力特点是()。
给定资料1.“原来一年能赚七八千万元,可今年的价格怎么也上不来。不仅融资难,而且融资成本高。以前就一个业务员,现在增加了好几个。”J公司董事长陈某2015年以来一直忧心忡忡,经营的开关厂和洗煤厂正在经历“艰难期”,让他很发愁。“山西‘一
ToqualifytostudyinBelgium,itisessentialtomeetrelevantrequirementsin(1)academiccredentials,(2)linguisticskills
最新回复
(
0
)