首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to brea
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to brea
admin
2020-09-01
36
问题
Smoking bans in public places are becoming more and more common in many countries. Whether the rights of the non-smokers to breathe in fresh air outweigh those of the smokers to smoke freely is a matter of opinion, manifesting itself in a heated smoking ban debate. In the following excerpt, the author states the effect of the smoking ban. Read the excerpt carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the author’s opinion:
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
The English smoking ban came into force on July 1, 2007. Smoking is banned in almost all enclosed public spaces, including pubs, restaurants and on public transport. Only places that are "like homes" or are specifically excluded by the health secretary are exempt from the ban. In essence, smoking is only allowed outdoors and in private homes. Posters must be displayed in all workplaces reminding people that smoking is illegal. Individuals who defy the ban face a £50 on-the-spot fine: businesses can be fined £200 for allowing smoking or not displaying the signs.
There are many shocking things about the smoking ban—or, at least, they would be shocking if we were not inured to them.
First, there’s the fact that the flimsy evidence that passive smoking causes any significant harm is taken seriously. According to figures from Action on Smoking and Health(ASH)—Britain’s fundamentalist anti-smoking lobby group—the incidence of lung cancer for non-smokers is about 10 cases per 100,000 people. Regular passive smoking(that is, living with a smoking partner, not just encountering one in bars or restaurants) increases that by about 25 percent—12.6 cases per 100,000. So, even if these figures are correct, passive smoking causes 2.5 cases of lung cancer per 100,000 of the population: to put it another way, these are odds of 40,000-to-one of potentially getting lung cancer from passive smoking. On the basis of these remote risks, a war against smokers has been built.
The second shocking thing is that governments now believe it is their right—even duty—to decide what vices we engage in. In this, the UK is not alone. From Argentina to Zambia, governments and local authorities have been queuing up to make it extremely difficult for people to indulge in filthy habits. Only this week, the Dutch joined the smoking ban club, exactly a year after England’s pubs and restaurants went smoke-free(or "smokefree" to use the single-word, Orwellian Newspeak preferred by the New Labour government). On the same day, patients in England’s mental institutions received the "protection" of the law, too—that is, they will from now on be "protected" from smoke by a super-killjoy ban on smoking even in hospitals for the mentally ill.
Another shocking thing is the way in which the people have been browbeaten into accepting this kind of state intervention. A quarter of the population is actively engaged, at some time or other, in the pastime of smoking: and most of the rest of the population was once happy to tolerate that pastime. Yet a noisy minority, joining forces with governments that are increasingly keen to micromanage our most personal affairs and behaviour, has managed to criminalize a perfectly normal activity. This state of affairs has been accepted with barely a murmur of protest.
The consequences for our everyday life have been profound. Smokers are now marked out as "undesirables" , shunted on to the street or to some other open area to partake in their evil habit. The simple business of socializing has been undermined: alcohol-fueled chatter is persistently interrupted by the disappearance of smokers to the nearest open space. Many people, particularly the elderly, for whom getting up and walking outside every time they want a cigarette is something of an ordeal, are visiting pubs less and less. There is something rather inhumane in the zealous anti-smoking crusade, where the health authorities and their cheerleaders seem happy to make our life worse in the name of "protecting us" from harm.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
My Views on the Public Smoking Ban The harsh English public smoking ban has been in effect for more than nine years, followed by many facts that some of us cannot understand. Firstly, passive smoking does not cause lung cancer as has been imagined: secondly, it is taken for granted that the governments think it is their duty to prohibit public smoking: and thirdly, even heavy smokers accept the ban naturally without thinking of it as abnormal. It seems that smokers are categorized as " undesirables", with socializing undermined and protection abused. Though some people believe the public smoking ban is an unwarranted infringement upon a person’s right of freedom to choose, and the ban is built on junk science, harms social life and many people’s livelihoods, and affects a country’s revenue, I am 100% in favor of the smoking ban. Firstly, smoking bans originate from medical considerations. Some people think passive smoking is not relevant to lung cancer, but research does show that secondhand smoke is nearly as harmful as smoking itself. Those living in homes with smokers have a 20 to 30 percent higher risk of developing lung cancer than those who do not. Many see it unfair that they have to suffer the effects of secondhand smoke when they socialize with those who smoke. Smoking bans remove these risks for the non-smokers. Secondly, smoking bans are implemented because they raise air quality in such establishments as restaurants and bars as well. Some studies have shown that the indoor air quality in bars and restaurants which are smoke-free is nine times better than those without smoking bans. That’s why we see that in many developed countries many smokers have their pastime on the street or in a fixed spot outside the building. What’s more, in part, the smoking ban may eliminate the chance of fire and other accidents as well. From what has been discussed above, it is safe to come to the conclusion that to restrict smoking in public areas is more than welcome.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YzIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
FiveTypesofBooksI.IntroductionA.Readingforinformation,hopingto—improveourmindswiththeinformationacquired—g
A、Partiallyincluded.B、Alreadycovered.C、Partiallystamped.D、Alreadyexcluded.B在谈到邮资的问题上,女士说到,邮局会出售挂号信封,且这些信封已经包含了first-clas
Itisaknownfactthatphysicalactivityimprovesoverallhealth.Notonlydoesitimprovecirculation,increasebloodflowto
Asmanyas40%ofuniversitylanguagedepartmentsarelikelytoclosewithinadecade,theformergovernmentadviserchargedw
开卷有益,是古人奖励读书的一句成语。从前读到一册坏书,读后每觉得为古人所欺;现在多了一点智识,反过来又觉得古人的不欺我了。总之,好书读了,原有所得,就是可以知道它的好处在哪里。可是坏书读了,而知道它的坏的原因与地方,岂不也是一得?从前孔子说的“三人行,必有
沙漠里真有魔鬼吗?在那时人们的知识水平看起来,确像是有魔鬼在作怪。但是人们掌握了自然规律以后,便可把这种光怪陆离的现象说清楚。这种现象在大戈壁夏天中午是常见的。当人们旅行得渴不可耐的时候,忽然看见一个很大的湖,里面蓄着碧蓝的清水,看来并不很远。当人们欢天喜
科技是人类文明进步的动力源泉。古老的中国,曾在世界科技史上占有重要地位。今天的中国人民,不仅与全世界共享科技文明的成果,也在各个领域推动世界科技的进步。科技奥运将反映科技最新进展,集成全国科技创新成果,推出一届高科技含量的体育盛会;提高北京科技创新能力,推
沪港股票市场互通(沪港通)不仅是内地资本市场的利好,对香港而言,沪港通也是块“肥肉”。香港能在内地资本市场开发和人民币国际化过程中扮演“独家中介”角色,是因为香港目前还是最大的人民币境外交易中心。但香港的中心地位并非不可撼动。10月14日,英国政府宣布发行
时代变了,像她这样一个经历了两种社会,大起大落,酸甜苦辣,极度变化的演员,一旦当她走出本来生活的小圈子,走出舞台,走进社会生活的深水里、激流中,以她异常敏感的眼睛、富有情感的心灵去观察生活、体会生活时,她发现那些纷至沓来的新鲜事物,根本来不及用电影去表现。
我特别喜欢他的那幅《向日葵》,朵朵黄花有如明亮的珍珠,耀人眼目,但孤零零插在花瓶里,配着黄色的背景,给人的是种凄凉的感觉,似乎是盛宴散后,灯烛未灭的那种空荡荡的光景,令人为之心沉。我原是爱看向日葵的,每天清晨看它们缓缓转向阳光,洒着露珠,是那样的楚楚可怜亦
随机试题
古希腊哲学史上关于“人不能两次踏进同一条河流"和“人一次也不能踏进同一条河流”这两种说法【】
女,57岁。因口眼干燥,伴双侧腮腺反复肿大5年,牙齿块状脱落3年来诊。患者5年来,出现明显口眼干燥,吞咽固体食物困难,眼泪液分泌也明显减少,曾有4次双腮反复肿痛史。曾在外院检查:抗SSA抗体(+),双角膜荧光染色阳性。口腔检查:口腔黏膜干燥,粘口镜,口底唾
关于我国法的渊源,下列观点中正确的是()
服务企业的()是服务人员向顾客提供服务、使顾客满意的过程。
关于风险中性原理,下列表述中正确的有()。
在道德修养方法上,提出“其身正,不令而行;其身不正,虽令不从”主张的是()。
青工于某,一日晚发现某单位大院的一辆桑塔纳汽车车门未锁,即借着夜色将此车开出大院,驶到其情敌刘某每天上夜班必经的一小胡同口,将骑车上夜班的刘某撞死,然后急忙驾车逃离现场。因奔逃心切而闯红灯,将一带小孩过马路的妇女撞倒在地,造成一死一伤的严重后果。当夜于某又
Nearlytwo-thirdsofbusinessesintheUKwanttorecruitstaffwithforeignlanguageskills.Frenchisstillthemosthighlypr
A、Morethan60%ofthejobsinhisregioncouldbeautomatedinthefuture.B、Morethan25%Hispanicsinhisregionwouldbeaff
Trustisfundamentaltolife.Ifyoucan’ttrustanything,lifebecomesintolerable.Youcan’thaverelationshipswithouttrust,
最新回复
(
0
)