首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
admin
2015-09-26
53
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
All of the following statements are CORRECT EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、Japanese does not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns
B、Japanese are less sexist than males who speak English
C、traditionally we say "A good teacher always makes sure he is well prepared for the lesson. "
D、in order to avoid the problem we can use plural form to replace the singular
答案
B
解析
推理题。文章最后一句…but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languagesare less sexist than males who speak English!明确指出,日语等代词体系中不存在性别歧视的国家并不能保证该国不存在其他形式的性别歧视,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bYXK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Ireallyappreciate______metogetoutofthetroublesthatIranintorecentlybutfoundithardtohandle.
AnundergraduateofEnglishatauniversity,inarecentlettertotheuniversity’spresident,complainedaboutthemandatoryma
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
IfyouhavereallybeenstudyingEnglishforsolong,it’sabouttimeyou______abletowritelettersinEnglish.
Prof.White,myrespectedtutor,frequentlyremindsmeto______myselfofeverychancetoimprovemyEnglish.
Surprisingly,nooneknowshowmanychildrenreceiveeducation,inEnglishhospitals,stilllessthecontentorqualityofthat
Surprisingly,nooneknowshowmanychildrenreceiveeducation,inEnglishhospitals,stilllessthecontentorqualityofthat
随机试题
科研课题
A.术后24小时下床活动B.术后卧床制动48小时C.术后卧床制动1周D.术后卧床制动2周E.术后卧床制动3周静脉血管重建术后应()
不使用颗粒性抗原的免疫反应是
A、续断B、巴戟天C、杜仲D、人参E、山药为治肾虚腰膝酸痛或筋骨无力要药的是()。
凡有条件者,截流时采用的材料均应优先选用()截流。
各国的高等教育招生制度,大体可分为两种方式,一种是高考选拔制,另一种是_______。
经过90年的奋斗、创造、积累,党和人民必须倍加珍惜、长期坚持、不断发展的成就不包括()。
确定两人从A地出发经过B、C、D沿逆时针方向行走一圈回到A的方案(如下图所示).其中,弧形代表山路,直线代表木桥,且每段山路或者木桥每次均只能有一人通过,则不同的方案有().
[*]
姚明是中国第一位国际篮球巨星,身价(personalwealth)超过10亿美元。前年,姚明因复发性足部和腿部伤病退出赛场。4个月后,他在上海一知名学府注册入校。学校为他量身定做了学位课程(degreeprogram),并主要采取单独授课的方式。据一家
最新回复
(
0
)