首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
admin
2015-09-26
62
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
All of the following statements are CORRECT EXCEPT that______.
选项
A、Japanese does not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns
B、Japanese are less sexist than males who speak English
C、traditionally we say "A good teacher always makes sure he is well prepared for the lesson. "
D、in order to avoid the problem we can use plural form to replace the singular
答案
B
解析
推理题。文章最后一句…but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languagesare less sexist than males who speak English!明确指出,日语等代词体系中不存在性别歧视的国家并不能保证该国不存在其他形式的性别歧视,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bYXK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
IfyouhavereallybeenstudyingEnglishforsolong,it’sabouttimeyou______abletowritelettersinEnglish.
Shewasteachingme______youwouldteachayoungerchildtospeakthelanguage.
Surprisingly,nooneknowshowmanychildrenreceiveeducation,inEnglishhospitals,stilllessthecontentorqualityofthat
随机试题
传统的集合运算包括()。
浅反射包括
某股份有限公司现有净资产5000万元。该公司于2017年1月发行一年期公司债券500万元。2017年11月,该公司又发行三年期公司债券600万元。2018年7月,该公司拟再次发行公司债券。根据《证券法》的规定,该公司此次发行公司债券的最高限额为()万元
“精巧玲珑、奇秀异常、色渥如丹、灿若明霞”的地貌特征属于()景观。
高校科研评价,现在世界各国大部分都采用________和同行评价两种方式。
建立班集体的正常秩序是维持和控制学生在校生活的最重要的条件,是教育教学开展的重要基础。()
教师的言论、行动、为人处世的态度,对学生具有耳濡目染、潜移默化的作用。这是教师的()。
《治安管理处罚法》第16条规定:有两种以上违反治安管理行为的,分别决定,合并执行。行政拘留处罚合并执行的,最长不超过( )日。
财产处分行为:是指直接发生财产权移转或消灭效果的行为。财产处分行为的结果是权利的移转,权利内容缩小或改变,权利上设定负担以及权利消灭等。根据上述定义,下述行为中不属于财产处分行为的是()。
Accordingtopsychologists,acompulsivespenderwantstospendalotofmoneybecause:
最新回复
(
0
)