首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
74
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
Why does the author say that financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money? Why does the author introduce Warren Buffett’s comment(para. 4)?
选项
答案
financial sectors are trying various means to gain more money from manufacturing sectors+ business sectors / try to strengthen its control of the economy / using financial products(complex derivatives)to get money from the market / Warren Burrett sees through the tricky schemes of financial institution and tries hard to avoid business with commercial securities / he uses the expression "weapons of mass destruction" to expose that financial sectors could bring destruction to a country’s economy
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fcSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thedaythissmalltowntolditsresidentstostopdrinkingthewater,lifeonGlendaleBoulevardturnedfromquiettoalarm
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Asthefederalgovernmentshutdownapproachesthetwo-weekmark,it’sbecomepainfullyapparentthatthepubliccannolongerru
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
A、Thelibraryshoulddeveloptowardsthemulti-operationstrend.B、Thegovernmentwilldecreaseitscapitalinputinthelibrary
A、TheoriginalmeaningofHamburgmeansbayandfortress.B、Hamburgisthethirdlargestcityinthecountry.C、TheoriginofHa
A、Asanexampleofinterracialintimacy.B、Becausehewasaslaveownerandwasstronglyagainstinterracialmarriages.C、Becaus
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
随机试题
板桩码头按其板桩墙所采用的材料可分为()。
同年同月同日出生的刘某、项大和项二是某市D区楚汉中学的同班同学,刘某居住在该市A区,项大和项二都居住在B区,在一次班级活动中,三人都报名参加攀登C区的爬山比赛。在爬山过程中,项大和项二为争第一,故意将刘某推倒,导致刘某头部受伤。活动组织者立即将刘某送往医院
为加强路面沥青层与沥青层之间、沥青层与水泥混凝土路面之间的粘结而洒布的沥青材料薄层,称为粘层。()
会长办公会的组成不包括()。
资产管理业务,是指证券公司作为( ),依法为客户提供证券及其他金融产品的投资管理服务的行为。
某化妆品厂为增值税一般纳税人。2012年1月发生以下业务:8B销售化妆品400箱,每箱不含税价600元;15销售同类化妆品500箱,每箱不含税价650元。当月以200箱同类化妆品与某公司换取精油。该厂当月应纳消费税()元。(2012年)
A、 B、 C、 D、 A题干中的四个图形中每个图形所包含的直线数目分别为3,4,5,6,所以应选一个由7条线段构成的图形,故选A。
【B1】______【B15】______
E-mailFrom:MeganCampbellTo:MartaApterMarta:I’msorryIdidn’trespondtoyoure-mailearlier.Ih
A、Thehouseholdchores.B、Thepreparationfordinner.C、Thewashingandironing.D、Smallrepairsaroundthehouse.D讲座开头讲到现代女性慢慢
最新回复
(
0
)