首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
75
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
Why does the author say that financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money? Why does the author introduce Warren Buffett’s comment(para. 4)?
选项
答案
financial sectors are trying various means to gain more money from manufacturing sectors+ business sectors / try to strengthen its control of the economy / using financial products(complex derivatives)to get money from the market / Warren Burrett sees through the tricky schemes of financial institution and tries hard to avoid business with commercial securities / he uses the expression "weapons of mass destruction" to expose that financial sectors could bring destruction to a country’s economy
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fcSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
MaintainingFriendshipinAdolescenceSecondaryschoolcanbea【C1】________placeforadolescentswhodon’thaveabestfrien
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
HIV/AIDSisnowrecognizedclearlyasagrowingthreattoChina.AccordingtoofficialChineseestimates,Chinanowhasapproxim
Betweenthe1950sand1980s,wesawtremendousimprovementsinthesafetyofthefoodweeatinEurope.Whatwecancallthe"fi
Mr.President,LadiesandGentlemen,Ourworldisundergoingprofoundchanges.Peaceanddevelopmentremainthethemeofour
A、TodoyogaistosolderaunionbetweenmindandbodyB、Yogahealsyoubyrelaxingyou.C、Yourdeepbreathingcanreleaseyour
A、ThetourismindustryisundergoingrestructuringinpartsoftheworldB、Itremainsthoroughlyfragmentedandwidelydistribut
随机试题
判定下列级数的敛散性,若收敛,请指出是条件收敛还是绝对收敛:
要根据树木的用途,采用不同的施肥方案,观叶观形树应多施()。
急性乳腺炎最常见的致病菌是
索赔按照当事人分类不包括()。
下列关于违约金的表述正确的有()。
中央银行的职能包括()。
陈某将装有2万元现金的行李箱寄存在车站寄存处,但在寄存时未告知行李箱内有现金。陈某凭取物单取行李箱发行该行李箱已被人取走,陈某要求寄存处赔偿。根据《合同法》的规定,下列关于寄存处承担赔偿责任的表述中,正确的是()。
消费品所传达的概念远比物体本身重要,它是彰显个人信仰、态度、社会经济地位的名片,这也就是概念消费。普通消费品尽管也能满足人的基本需求,但是它所传达的概念却为普通大众共有,彰显不出消费者的独特性。因此,消费者势必另辟蹊径,寻找一些能标示自己独特性的消费方式。
关于社会发展总体布局问题,十六大提出“三位一体”(经济建设、政治建设、文化建设),十七大提出“四位一体”(经济建设、政治建设、文化建设和社会建设),十八大进一步拓展到“五位一体”(经济建设、政治建设、文化建设、社会建设、生态文明建设)。这一变化包含的哲学道
Brushingyourteethregularlynomatterwhichtoothpasteyouuse,willreduceyourchancesoftoothdecay.Scientistshaveconcl
最新回复
(
0
)