首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below. For each question 15-20, mark one le
admin
2012-12-14
40
问题
Read the article on the opposite page about innovation in business and the questions below.
For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Not long ago innovation was The Big Idea in marketing circles. Now, however, it’s hard to see the benefits of this rush to innovate. Indeed if anything, companies seem to be drawing back from innovation, not charging ahead. But just a few years ago many companies were combining a commitment to create entirely new product categories through innovative technologies working to hugely ambitious growth targets with a root-and-branch organisational overhaul designed to free up creativity and speed new product roll-outs.
The result was that as resources were shifted away from core businesses, sales and profits faltered, share prices slumped and CEOs were ousted. Now the mantra is a more conservative focus on the top brands, the top retail customers and the top markets. It’s being rewarded in many cases by healthier share prices. This sustained effort to cut long tails of smaller brands and focus marketing resource on existing leaders seems to be paying off.
So were we wrong to pinpoint innovation as key to long-term market success? Surely not. But we might have underestimated the enormous complexity of this beast. The term "innovation" may be simple enough but it spans a vast landscape, including the type and degree of innovation, marketing purpose, management process and market circumstance, not all of which are well understood.
Take "type" of innovation. Are we talking about new products only? Or new processes, new channels, underlying technologies, organisational structures and business models? When should the innovation involve a new brand? Or take "degree". Are we aiming for blue-sky inventions that will transform markets and create new categories? Or marginal tweaks in, say, formulation or packaging that give us an excuse to advertise something "New! Improved!"? Likewise, is the marketing purpose of the project to steal a march on competitors and drive incremental growth, or to update an obsolete product line and play catch-up to competitors? As one business news editorial complained, "innovation" is often just "simple proliferation of similar products". Then there’s process. What is the best way to manage this particular innovation? Is it to employ creative revolutionaries and set them free, or is disciplined risk management, requiring the careful testing and sifting of options to pick winners a better approach? In larger organisations, has senior management really made time spent in cross-functional teams a recognised element of successful career paths? What time frames (eg. payback periods) and degrees of risk is senior management comfortable with? And does the organisation have a culture that fits the chosen approach? Does it "celebrate failure", for example, or is it actually a risk-averse blame culture (despite what the CEO says in the annual report) ?
Successful innovation requires clearing two hurdles. First, it needs the right project with the right degree of innovation to fit with the right marketing purpose, the right innovation process, corporate culture and market circumstance. Second, it needs senior managers that understand the interplay between these different factors, so that rather than coming together simply by chance, they are deliberately brought together in different ways to meet different circumstances.
Clearing Hurdle Two can happen "by accident". Clearing Hurdle One requires real skill. We can all point to admirable, inspiring innovations. But how many companies can we point to and say "these people have mastered the art of innovation"? Brilliant innovation is a wonderful thing. Expert innovation management is even better and much rarer.
According to the first paragraph, a few years ago companies______.
选项
A、trusted in technology to improve existing products
B、chose to focus heavily on marketing activities
C、expected that growth would increase steadily
D、believed they needed to produce new goods
答案
D
解析
由“But just a few years ago manycompanies were combining a commitment tocreate entirely new product...”可知,但是就在几年前,很多公司都转向成立专门小组来研发新的产品,D与此相近。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/mQ7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisMegan’sThreads?
Whattypeofbusinessisthemanmostlikelycalling?
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Marketingresearch:theimportanceofresearchtothecompanybeforetakingaction
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Askingquestions查询
Communication:thefactorsinvolvedindeterminingstaffaccesstoconfidentialinformation
TaskSheetforCandidateATaskSheet1A:Stafftraining:howtomaintainthestaff’sinterestinthecompany’strainingprogra
•Youwillheararecruitingmanagertellinghowtofindjobsontheweb.•Asyoulisten,forquestions1-12,completethenotes
ALargeseverancepaymentwasmade.BApartnershipabroadwasformed.CNexttime,abetterscheduleneedstobearr
随机试题
A.造血干细胞增生和分化异常B.遗传性Hb合成异常C.慢性失血D.获得性红细胞膜缺陷E.遗传性红细胞膜缺陷缺铁性贫血
功效为理气化痰,清胆和胃的方剂是
下列食物中饱和脂肪酸含量最低的油脂是
A、发霉B、泛油C、虫蛀D、潮解E、粘连乳香在储存中易发生()
证券回购交易双方在报价时,输入资金年收益率数值,不可省略百分号。()
IarrivedintheUnitedStatesonFebruary6,1966,butIremembermyfirstdayhereveryclearly.Myfriendwaswaitingforme
A.YoucanfrequentlyfindyoungpeoplethereinsteadoftheseniorsB.MaybeIcantryitinthenearfutureC.Ireallyenjoy
推论统计中最常用的统计量数是
法律的效力范围包括许多方面,下列选项中不涉及法律效力范围的是
Thisvillagewhichissurroundedbymountainsisonly______byriver,anditisobviousthatthetransportationisinconvenient.
最新回复
(
0
)