首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
admin
2011-01-10
53
问题
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrow’s universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.
The most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet University— a voluntary community to scholars/teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy scheduling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the world’s great libraries.
Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware, produced by a few superstar teachers, marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a "college education in a box" could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.
On the other hand, while global connectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education, that does not mean greater uniformity in course content—or other dangers—will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.
Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioning the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building theft individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and the world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become "if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?"
Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrow’s university faculty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A second group, mentors, would function much like today’s faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.
A third new role for faculty, and in Gidley’s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students/colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.
Moreover, there seems little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be "enrolled" in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, between—or even during—sessions at a real-world problem-focused institution.
As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enough to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities.
Which category of writing does the review belong to?
选项
A、Narration.
B、Description
C、Persuasion.
D、Exposition.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nncO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thestudentunion’spresidentwasappalledbythecomplacencyofhisclassmates;notoneoftheseniorsseemedtocareaboutthe
Walkingthroughmytrainyesterday,staggeringfrommyseattothebuffetandback,IcountedfivepeoplereadingHarryPottern
BenjaminFranklinwasrememberedforhisgoodjudgment.
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intuitivelyandbeautifully,witharomantic,attacking
女士们,先生们,上午好!中国和马来西亚是友好近邻,两国传统友谊源远流长。中国明朝郑和七下西洋,五次到达马六甲,同当地人民友好交往和互利通商,至今传为佳话。中马建交33年来,两国经贸合作持续快速发展。中国海关统计,2006年两国贸易额达371亿
当年为了实现乌拉圭回合,各个成员费了很大劲儿,但事后的结果并不乐观,世界经济更不平衡,两极分化越加严重。面对这一现象,发展中国家不能容忍,发达国家也感到了危机。正因为如此,大家才把多哈回合定为发展回合。这是WTO历史上巨大的进步,也是各个成员富有远见的选择
在一个通过电话和电脑的快速交流时代,面对面的见面方式显得浪费时间和精力,但是,他们仍然是做事情的重要组成部分。关键词汇:via:通过;face-to-face:面对面。如果能把"Inanageoffastcommunicationviatel
A、Three.B、Four.C、Morethanfour.D、Notmentioned.A
随机试题
给定程序中,函数fun的功能是:计算出形参s所指字符串中包含的单词个数,作为函数值返回。为便于统计,规定各单词之间用空格隔开。例如,形参s所指的字符串为:ThisisaClanguageprogram.,函数的返回值为6。请在程序的下划线处填入
入汤剂宜先煎的是
目标的动态控制是一个有限的循环过程,应贯穿于工程项目实施阶段的全过程。()
廉洁政府2013年7月18日,中央部门集中公开2012年决算,包括“三公”经费、行政经费等数据。截至18日晚9时,记者共查询到80多个部门公布了决算,绝大多数部门的决算都远超预算幅度,2012年决算总额达9200多亿元,超出2012年预算2200
行政赔偿是指行政机关及其工作人员违法行使职权,侵犯了公民、法人或其他组织的合法权益并造成损害,由国家承担赔偿责任的制度。根据上述定义,下列各项要求中属于行政赔偿范围的是()。
“再A,也B”是()关系复句。
(2008年真题)甲公司因生产经营需要,于2007年10月10日以自有的2号厂房作抵押向A银行借款200万元,双方于10月15日办理了抵押登记手续。同年10月30日,甲公司又以自己的专利权作质押与B银行签订了100万元的借款合同及专利权质押合同,但未办理质
下列图像格式中,可以将多幅图像保存为一个图像文件,从而形成动画的是(29)。不属于视频影像文件的是(30)。
打开窗体需要执行的宏操作是()。
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须都保存在考生文件夹下。小李是某政法学院教务处的工作人员,为更好地掌握各个教学班级学习的整体情况,教务处领导要求她制作成绩分析表。请根据考生文
最新回复
(
0
)