首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly
admin
2011-01-10
35
问题
The University in transformation, edited by Australian futurists Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrow’s universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.
The most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet University— a voluntary community to scholars/teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy scheduling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the world’s great libraries.
Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware, produced by a few superstar teachers, marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a "college education in a box" could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.
On the other hand, while global connectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education, that does not mean greater uniformity in course content—or other dangers—will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.
Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioning the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building theft individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and the world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become "if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?"
Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrow’s university faculty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A second group, mentors, would function much like today’s faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.
A third new role for faculty, and in Gidley’s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students/colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.
Moreover, there seems little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be "enrolled" in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, between—or even during—sessions at a real-world problem-focused institution.
As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enough to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities.
Which category of writing does the review belong to?
选项
A、Narration.
B、Description
C、Persuasion.
D、Exposition.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/nncO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
BusinesspeopleabroadwhowanttomakeconnectionswithChinesecompaniescantakethefirststepusinganewInternetsiteour
TheCentralBankisinterestedinhowmuchmoneyisin______intheeconomy.
Nowwhicharetheanimalsreallytobepitiedincaptivity?First,thosecleverbeingswhoselivelyurgeforactivitycanfindn
Sadly,whiletheacademicindustrythrives,thepracticeoftranslationcontinuesto______.
______couplesgenerallysharethesamevaluesandhavesimilarlifestylesandgoals.
Oneoftherealservicesofthehistoricalnovelisnotthatitcanbeasubstituteforhistory,buttlatitcanbea(n)extensio
AlphaZeroseemstoexpressinsight.Itplayslikenocomputereverhas,intuitivelyandbeautifully,witharomantic,attacking
尊敬的梅莱斯•泽纳维总理阁下,尊敬的各位国家元首和政府首脑阁下,尊敬的非洲联盟委员会主席阿尔法•乌马尔•科纳雷阁下,各位代表团团长、部长和大使阁下,女士们,先生们://我很高兴来到亚的斯亚贝巴,与出席中非合
A、Around1,000.B、About40.C、Approximately6.D、Notmentioned.D
随机试题
许多著名文学家和艺术家食不果脯还坚持创作是出于()
目前已知能独立生存的最小微生物是
患者女,45岁。行乳癌根治术后,为预防皮下积液及皮瓣坏死的主要措施是()
甲状腺大部切除术后呼吸困难和窒息的常见原因是__________、__________、压迫气管、喉头水肿、和喉返神经损伤。
耐油性最好的橡胶是()。
M公司为增税值一般纳税人,2011年6月1日“应交税费—应交增值税”账户无余额,6月份销项税额50000元,进项税额70000元,进项税额转出30000元。M公司6月份应交增值税()元。
下列估价对象中,适宜用收益法的有()。
在侦查机关第二次讯问后或对犯罪嫌疑人采取强制措施之日起,犯罪嫌疑人可以聘请律师为其提供法律咨询、代理申诉、控告。()
下列各项中不属于中国十大名茶的是()。
Youmaysaythatthebusinessofmarkingbooksisgoingtoslowdownyourreading.【C1】______probablywill.That’soneofthe【C2】
最新回复
(
0
)