首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebr
admin
2017-03-15
75
问题
Fifty years ago, Robert Solow published the first of two papers on economic growth that eventually won him a Nobel prize. Celebrated and seasoned, he was thus a natural choice to serve on an independent "commission on growth" announced last month by the World Bank. (The commission will weigh and sift what is known about growth, and what might be done to boost it.)
Natural, that is, except for anyone who takes his 1956 contribution literally. For, according to the model he laid out in that article, the efforts of policymakers to raise the rate of growth per head are ultimately futile.
A government eager to force the pace of economic advance may be tempted by savings drives, tax cuts, investment subsidies or even population controls. As a result of these measures, each member of the labour force may enjoy more capital to work with. But this process of "capital deepening", as economists call it, eventually runs into diminishing returns. Giving a worker a second computer does not double his output.
Accumulation alone cannot yield lasting progress, Mr. Solow showed. What can? Anything that allows the economy to add to its output without necessarily adding more labour and capital. Mr. Solow labeled this font of wealth "technological progress" in 1956, and measured its importance in 1957. But in neither paper did he explain where it came from or how it could be accelerated. Invention, innovation and ingenuity were all "exogenous" influences, lying outside the remit of his theory. To practical men of action, Mr. Solow’s model was thus an impossible tease: what it illuminated did not ultimately matter; and what really mattered, it did little to illuminate.
The law of diminishing returns holds great sway over the economic imagination. But its writ has not gone unchallenged. A fascinating new book, Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations by David Warsh, tells the story of the rebel economics of increasing returns. A veteran observer of dismal scientists at work, first at the Boston Globe and now in an online column called Economic Principals, Mr. Warsh has written the best book of its kind since Peter Bernstein’s Capital Ideas.
Diminishing returns ensure that firms cannot grow too big, preserving competition between them. This, in turn, allows the invisible hand of the market to perform its magic. But, as Mr. Warsh makes clear, the fealty economists show to this principle is as much mathematical as philosophical. The topology of diminishing returns is easy for economists to navigate: a landscape of declining gradients and single peaks, free of the treacherous craters and crevasses that might otherwise entrap them.
The hero of the second half of Mr. Warsh’s book is Paul Romer, of Stanford University, who took up the challenge ducked by Mr. Solow. If technological progress dictates economic growth, what kind of economics governs technological advance? In a series of papers, culminating in an article in the Journal of Political Economy in 1990, Mr. Romer tried to make technology "endogenous", to explain it within the terms of his model. In doing so, he steered growth theory out of the comfortable cul-de-sac in which Mr. Solow had so neatly parked it.
The escape required a three-point turn. First, Mr. Romer assumed that ideas were goods—of a particular kind. Ideas, unlike things, are "non-rival": Everyone can make use of a single design, recipe or blueprint at the same time. This turn in the argument led to a second: the fabrication of ideas enjoys increasing returns to scale. Expensive to produce, they are cheap, almost costless, to reproduce. Thus the total cost of a design does not change much, whether it is used by one person or by a million.
Blessed with increasing returns, the manufacture of ideas might seem like a good business to go into. Actually, the opposite is true. If the business is free to enter, it is not worth doing so, because competition pares the price of a design down to the negligible cost of reproducing it.
Unless idea factories can enjoy some measure of monopoly over their designs—by patenting them, copyrighting them, or just keeping them secret—they will not be able to cover the fixed cost of inventing them. That was the final turn in Mr. Romer’s new theory of growth.
How much guidance do these theories offer to policymakers, such as those sitting on the World Bank’s commission? In Mr. Solow’s model, according to a common caricature, technology falls like "manna from heaven", leaving the bank’s commissioners with little to do but pray. Mr. Romer’s theory, by contrast, calls for a more worldly response: educate people, subsidies their research, import ideas from abroad, carefully gauge the protection offered to intellectual property.
But did policymakers need Mr. Romer’s model to reveal the importance of such things? Mr. Solow has expressed doubts. Despite the caricature, he did not intend in his 1956 model to deny that innovation is often dearly bought and profit-driven. The question is whether anything useful can be said about that process at the level of the economy as a whole. That question has yet to be answered definitively. In particular, Mr. Solow worries that some of the "more powerful conclusions" of the new growth theory are unearned, flowing as they do from powerful assumptions.
At one point in Mr. Warsh’s book, Mr. Romer is quoted comparing the building of economic models to writing poetry. It is a triumph of form as much as content. This creative economist did not discover anything new about the world with his 1990 paper on growth. Rather, he extended the metre and rhyme-scheme of economics to capture a world—the knowledge economy—expressed until then only in the loosest kind of doggerel. That is how economics makes progress. Sadly, it does not, in and of itself, help economies make progress.
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT true?
选项
A、The author holds that Solow’s 1956 contribution was a substantial feat.
B、Solow thinks that progress can be made with more labour and capital.
C、The author concludes that manufacture of ideas is not a good business to go into.
D、It is impossible to challenge the two articles Mr. Solow issued.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ouSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Thegreateconomiccrisiswas________bythepublicfearsaboutthesolvencyofthebanks.
Thereporterwas________inyesterday’snewspaperforhisunprofessionalbehavior.
当前,亚欧两地区都处于蓬勃发展的阶段。亚洲是世界上最具经济活力的地区,资源丰富,市场广阔,区域合作方兴未艾。欧盟是世界上最大的发达经济体,资本充裕,科技先进,一体化程度高。两地区政治上共识很多,经济上优势互补,文化上各具特色,为开展更广泛和具有实质性的对话
海洋是全球生命支持系统的一个不可缺少的组成部分。海洋不仅是自然资源的宝库,同时也是我们人类居住环境的重要调节器。中国政府高度重视海洋的开发和保护,不断加强海洋综合管理,促进海洋产业的协调发展。中国已经形成了具有区域特征的多学科的海洋科学体系。国家
Tome,themostinterestingandimmediatequestionisnotwhethertheUnitedStateswillratifytheKyotoProtocol,butwhether
共享经济常常有人问我什么是“共享经济”。现在正是时候,我来和大家解释一下“共享经济”的定义,定义可以帮助人们建立更好的“共享经济”。在这样的社会和经济系统中,人们可以分享信息和其它事物,任何组织中的所有人都可以进行商品和服务的生产、贸易和消费。
A、Theyheldprotestsagainstthegovernmentonthestreet.B、Theybecameindependentcanefarmers.C、Theywerecompensatedwith
Accordingtothespeaker,evenAmericaissufferingfromeconomicdepression,theAmericaneconomywillsoonberecoveredifAme
Idon’tseealotofTVcommercialsanymore,butthosesaccharineeHarmonyadsfeaturingNatalieColetrala-laingtheblight-on-
随机试题
社会诸要素之间在相互作用过程中形成的相对稳定的关系称为【】
患者女性,37岁。妊娠32周,因妊娠期高血压疾病需选择合适时机进行剖宫产手术,对胎儿进行成熟度评估。胎儿肺成熟可疑,若选择终止妊娠,应重点防范的情况是
A.4~5天B.7天C.9天D.12天E.14天
AB的方位角为134°,测得B点水平角(左角)∠ABC=89°,则CB的象限角余角为()。
风险值是风险评价表征量,包括()。
甲公司是汽车制造业一般纳税人,2016年8月,因经营需要拟新增办公楼一栋,对新增办公楼涉税政策,向税务师咨询如下问题:若8月购买办公楼并投入使用,增值税专用发票注明价格2000万,税额为220万,增值税专用发票经认证,说明进项税额分别在何时抵,并计算抵
对民办学校重大问题拥有决策权的是()。
有一个长方体容器,长40厘米,宽30厘米,高10厘米,里面的水深6厘米(最大面为底面)。如果把这个容器盖紧,再竖起来(最小面为底面),里面的水深是多少厘米?
(2019年河北事业)汉代乐府民歌在中国诗歌发展史上占有重要的地位。下列作品中叙述了一对青年男女的爱情悲剧,被誉为汉乐府叙事诗发展高峰的是()。
Writingforanhistoricalseriesistricky,andtheoutcomeisnotalwaysasuccess.ThebestoverallEuropeanhistoryinEnglis
最新回复
(
0
)