首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the s
admin
2010-07-19
24
问题
The Roslin Institute announced last week that it had applied to patent the method by which its scientists had cloned Dolly the sheep. The patent, if granted, would apply to "nuclear transfer technology" in both human and animal cells. One point of the patent is to help fund research into cures for diseases such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, cancer and heart failure.
Its other aim is to make some money. Last May, the Roslin Institute was taken over by Geron, an American biotech company. Geron has committed $32.5 million to research at the Roslin. It wants to get its money back. Two scientists from Stanford who developed the use of restriction enzymes, one of the fundamental techniques in biotechnology, made about pounds 80 million out of it in the 17 years before the patent expired. So you can see why Geron-Roslin is so keen to get its patent. There’s nothing wrong with that. Without the prospect of a return at the end of investment, no one would ever lend money to anyone involved in bio-medical research—and given the huge sums now required to develop a new drug, or a new diagnostic test for some medical condition, that would mean there wouldn’t be any research. It is wonderful when people give money to worthwhile causes with no hope of personal gain. But appealing to altruism simply won’t raise the billions required to develop and market drugs and therapies that rely on biotechnology. For that, you have to appeal to investors’ self-interest—which is why the bulk of medical research is funded not by charities or even tax-payers but by private companies and individuals.
The fact that biotech research depends on patents generates profound hostility. The opposition to the patenting of genetic sequences, cells, tissues and clones—critics call it "the privatization of nature"—takes many forms, from a Luddite desire to stop scientific research to a genuine, if mistaken, conviction that common ownership is always morally preferable to private property. But all of the objections have a single root. the sense that it must be wrong to make money out of the constituents of the human body. They cannot be "owned" by any individual, because they belong to everyone. There cannot be "property in people".
That is a profound mistake. The truth is rather the opposite: there is only property in things because there is property in people. People own their own bodies, and that ownership is the basis of their property rights (and most other individual rights, come to that). The problem with the law as it stands is that it doesn’t sufficiently recognize an individual’s property rights over his or her own body, and his or her entitlement to make money out of it.
The outcome of a lawsuit in the US nearly 10 years ago defined the de facto rules governing the ownership of human tissues, and the financial exploitation of the discoveries that derive from them. In Moorev the Regents of UCLA the issue was whether an individual was entitled to a share of the profits that a biotech company made from developing drugs or treatments derived from cells that came from his body. Dr David Golde had discovered that John Moore, one of his patients, had a pancreas whose cells had some unusual properties that might be helpful in treating a form of cancer. In his laboratory, Golde developed what his called a "cell line" from Moore’s cells and patented it. When Moore found out, he sued Dr Golde for a share of whatever profits the cell line generated.
Mr. Moore lost. The court said he had no right to any of those profits, because he did not own the cells removed from his body. Moreover, the court held that since "research on human cells plays a critical role in medical research", granting property rights to the patient from whom the cells came threatened to "hinder research by restricting access to the raw materials".
In essence, that decision said that biotech companies could own and make money out of human cells and tissue—but the person from whom that tissue or cells came could not. The logic behind that decision is bizarre. No one except the most unreconstructed communist disputes that I own my own body. Indeed, it is only because I own my body that I can come to own anything else independent of it, mixing my labor with something being the most fundamental means by which I can come to own it. If cells from Mr. Moore’s body are his property, how can anyone else come to own them—unless he sells or gives those cells to them? (778 words)
The main purpose for applying the patent is to ______.
选项
A、to make profit for biotech company
B、to repay the personal debt
C、to make the research possible to last 17 years
D、to make their research legal
答案
A
解析
上周Roslin研究所宣布它将申请克隆多利这项技术的专利,如果这项专利被批准的话,将会应用于人类和动物器官“核移植技术”。实际上申请专利的原因主要是两点;一是这项专利技术将会筹集资金用于研究治疗像帕金森病、癌症和心脏病。而更主要的一点是为了赚钱,因为这个研究所上周五被一家生物技术公司收购了。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/rAlO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThethirdparagraphexaminesAmerica’sfuture-mindednessfromthe______perspective.Theauthorpredictsinthelastparagrap
ItcanbeinferredfromthefirstparagraphthatcosmologistsAccordingtothepassage,theauthorthinksWMAP’sfindingsare
目前美国的所谓“人文教育”(liberalartseducation)的理念,在中国颇有些鼓吹者。但“人文教育”后面还有体育这一层。体育是学习人生的最好手段。体育和人生的关系,如同数学和科学的关系一样。因为体育能够把人生中千变万化的现象,抽象为几个最简
Thefineneedlesareused______.Beforealarge-scaletattooisfinished,thecustomermay______.
WhatcanyoulearnaboutBush’sproposalofaddingoptionalpersonalaccounts?Whichoneisnotthefundamentalelementofthe
ThecouplechoseIstanbulastheirholidaydestinationmainlybecause______.Thefamilyhaveseenorvisitedallthefollowing
A、Rome’sLaRepublic.B、TheFrench-languageSwissdaily24Hems.C、ARussiandaily.D、BritishtabloidtheDallyMirror.B
Anyonemakinglongdrivesthissummerwillnoticeanewdimensiontocontemporaryinequality:awideninggapbetweentheuserso
1 Duringtheadolescence,thedevelopmentofpoliticalideologybecomesapparentintheindividual;ideologyhereisdefinedas
Backin1985,ViktorCherkashinwasaseniorKGBofficerattheSovietEmbassyinWashington.Intheshadowyworldofespionage,
随机试题
中国服装设计师李艳萍设计的女士服装以典雅、高贵而享誉中外,在国际市场上,一件“李艳萍”牌中式旗袍售价高达1千余美元,这种定价策略属于()。
若f’(x0)=1,f(x0)=0,则
参与组成胸廓下口的结构有()
A.肥大B.增生C.二者均有D.二者均无
Trendelenburg试验的目的是检查()。
下列何种犯罪的主体是特殊主体?()
北京的六大高端产业功能区是以以下那个功能区为代表的()
(2014年真题)根据过度学习的研究,如果小学生读4遍后能够完整背诵一首诗,要达到最佳记忆效果,还应再背诵()。
一次演讲中,我问在座的大学生一个问题:“作为中国人,你有自豪感吗?”同学们一致回答:“有!”我接着问:“那到底是什么让你产生这种自豪感呢?”有人回答是长江,也有人回答是经济的高速发展,5000年的文明。我又问:“假如你清晨醒来,你突然发现自己变成一个非洲人
工程中有Form1、Form2两个窗体(Form1中有文本框Text1;Form2中有Text1文本框和Command1命令按钮)。Form1是启动窗体。在这些模块中编写下面的程序代码:Form1中的代码如下:PrivateSubT
最新回复
(
0
)