首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
64
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
resident
解析
名词。本题考查重点单词的重复或对应。本词是上文中residency的对应,但不是重复。因此注意区别resident和residency的拼写和含义。前者意为“居民”,后者意为“居住地”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
AsoundChina-U.S.relationshipservesthefundamentalinterestofthetwocountriesandtheirpeople,andthepeace,stability
TheWorld’sHeaviestDrinkingCountriesPeopleintheUKareamongthemostprolificdrinkersintheworld,accordingtoar
OldpeopleinThiengolysaytheycanrememberwhenthereweresomanytreesthatyoucouldn’tseethesky.Now,milesofreddish
AsdawnbreaksinHanoithebotanicalgardensstarttofillup.Hundredsofoldpeoplecomeeverymorningtoexercisebeforethe
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
假定A国居民公司在某纳税年度中总所得为10万元,其中来自A国的所得为7万元,来自B国的所得为3万元,A、B两国的所得税税率分别为30%、20%,若A国采取全额免税法,则该公司向A国的应纳税额为()
试述条形码在物流中的应用。
有关酶催化反应的特点中错误的是()
患者,女性,37岁,因活动后有呼吸困难,近半年有进行性加重,并伴有咳嗽、声音嘶哑。患者既往有风湿热10年,常有扁桃体炎发生,经医生诊断为慢性风湿性心瓣膜病。风心病二尖瓣狭窄最常见的心律失常是
江夏公司与飞天建筑公司订立了由飞天公司承建江夏公司办公楼的合同。关于此合同表述错误的是()。
长期股权投资采用成本法核算时,下列各项应该确认投资收益的是()。
中华文化博大精深,处处闪烁着辩证法思想的光辉。“千里之行,始于足下”“推陈出新,革故鼎新”“因地制宜,因材施教”“金无足赤,人无完人”所蕴含的哲学道理依次是()。①矛盾具有特殊性,要具体问题具体分析②辩证的否定是“扬弃”,是事物发展的环节③量变是
《民法通则》在债权一节规定的担保方式有保证、定金、违约金、抵押和留置。()
请在“答题”菜单下选择“电子表格”命令,然后按照题目要求打开相应的命令,完成下面的内容,具体要求如下:注意:下面出现的所有文件都必须保存在考生文件夹[K:\K01\1501006]下。1.打开工作簿文件EXCEL.XLS,将工作表sheet的A
YouarethesecretaryofMrFredJenkin,managingdirectorofthecompany,Youhavebeenasktomakesomechangedtoaprevious
最新回复
(
0
)