首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A、The distance they have travelled should be at least 1,600 kilometers. B、The foreign animals run amuck as they have no natural
A、The distance they have travelled should be at least 1,600 kilometers. B、The foreign animals run amuck as they have no natural
admin
2018-01-01
114
问题
Good afternoon, folks. In today’s lecture, we talk about the dinosaurs. One of the greatest mysteries about the dinosaurs is why they died out suddenly at the end of the Cretaceous Period 65 million years ago. A number of theories have been suggested to account for this mass extinction. The most popular theory is that a comet or meteorite hit the Earth and exploded with a terrific force, throwing up a dust cloud that blocked out the sun. Suddenly, it gets cold everywhere, and everyone dies. Nevertheless, I think this theory doesn’t work. Because it completely ignores most of what is happening on land. If you want to study dinosaurs and understand them, you’ve got to think about frogs and turtles and salamanders and mammals, too. You can’t take dinosaurs out of context. All the big animals were dinosaurs; that’s true. But most animals aren’t big. Go to the Amazon rain forest, or even a forest in New Jersey, and you’ll find that most of the animals there are small. If you exploded a nuclear bomb right now over Brazil blocking the sunlight and chilling the Amazon rain forest, who would die first? The big deer and jaguars or the little frogs? Frogs should die first, because they are the most delicate creatures in any ecosystem; their blood is in intimate contact with the water they live in. Also, a tropical frog exposed to a chill can’t hibernate, so it dies. A big animal, such as a deer or elephant, can stand a major chill and can move to another area. But have you ever heard of frog extinctions at the end of the Cretaceous Period? No. That’s because no frogs died out. No turtles or salamanders died out. None of these delicate animals, with no defense at all against a sudden chill, died out. But dinosaurs—the biggest, most active animals that should take weeks to kill—did die. This is true of every major extinction that has ever hit the Earth. Not so long ago, there were woolly mammoths and saber-toothed cats in Chicago. There were beavers the size of Buicks all over North America. They disappeared about 10,000 years ago So you may ask: what caused those mass extinctions? Well, it is very hard to come up with a theory that will kill big animals and leave little ones alone. The one thing that would do it is disease. This is a theory developed by American paleontologist Henry Osborn in 1899. He pointed out that when big animals travel, they’ll spread dozens of diseases and disrupt the ecology. Whenever we humans have brought animals from one continent to another, bad things happen. Someone brought starlings from England to North America, and we have a starling problem. Introduce foreign animals and they run amuck. They do not have natural predators and also they spread disease. Whenever there was a mass extinction on land, there were land bridges connecting the continents and big animals moving across them. During most of the history of life, broad oceans have separated the continents. But, periodically, those ocean barriers get drained away and animals can move. Big animals travel very easily. Give an elephant a land bridge and the population will spread at least 1,600 kilometers in two years. Little animals don’t move nearly as fast. It takes a long time for the population of a snake, salamander, or frog to spread. Osborn pointed out that if big animals move across land bridges and start spreading, you’re going to have extinctions caused by disease or disruptions to the ecosystem. There is no way to prevent it. So I like Osborn’s theory. It’s based in ecological reality. We know that foreign animals always cause disaster.
Question No. 16 What is the most popular theory about the dinosaurs’ extinction?
Question No. 17 Why are frogs the most delicate creatures in an ecosystem?
Question No. 18 What is the theory developed by American paleontologist Henry Osborn in 1899?
Question No. 19 Which of the following is NOT regarded as a major extinction of species?
Question No. 20 According to the speaker, what is essential in the spread of diseases by big animals?
选项
A、The distance they have travelled should be at least 1,600 kilometers.
B、The foreign animals run amuck as they have no natural predators.
C、There should be land bridges connecting the continents.
D、There are humans who bring pets from one continent to another.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/0lSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
SeventeenyearsafterthefalloftheBerlinwall,areunifiedGermanywillthrowopenitsdoorstotheworld.Germany2006will
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国经济社会发展的讲话。中国的改革开放已经走过了26个年头。26年来,中国发生了翻天覆地的变化。中国经济持续快速增长,国内生产总值从不到1500亿美元增长到1.65万亿美元。进出口总额从206亿美元增长到1.15
Children’ssurvival,protectionandgrowthhaveadirectbearingonacountryandanation’sfutureanddestiny.TheChinesena
A、AComparativeStudyoftheTelecomIndustryinChinaandIndiaB、DifferencesonUseofMobilePhonesinChinaandIndiaC、Geog
A、Theyallowittomaneuvereffectivelyinasmallareas.B、Theyallowittoswimquicklyoverlongdistances.C、Dorsalandpect
A、oflittlenutritionalvalueB、difficulttogrowC、aplantthatexhauststhesoilD、asourceofproteinD根据关键词正确找寻到原文相关处是解题的关键。
Whoweretakenhostageinthereportedkidnapping?
美国商人经常利用社交场合来做生意,最好的例子就是商务午餐,可以用来争取客户,扩大影响,讨论并解决内部分歧,甚至面试未来的员工。很多工作面试都是在商务午餐中完成的。商务午餐通常持续一到两个半小时,在餐厅举行,那里安静宜人,适合进行私人对话。“settlei
因为是大宗定货,我接受你提出的8.5美元的价格。然而,那是非常便宜的价格,我们几乎无利可图。
Today,ifyoumadealistofthemassmediayouuse,youwouldhavetoaddnewertechnologiessuchascable,satelliteTV,PDAs
随机试题
尿道下裂的叙述下列哪项是错误的
不属于原始反射的是
下列属于疏水性氨基酸的是
患者,男性,32岁。因双下肢皮肤干燥变薄、苍白,汗毛脱落、肌肉萎缩就诊。检查足背动脉搏动消失,以“血栓闭塞性脉管炎”收入院。入院后行血栓闭塞性脉管炎术,术后护士观察肢体远端血供情况,观察的体征应除外
下列有关诉讼财产保全的说法正确的有()。
在填制报关单时,海关根据进出口商品的不同情况,对商品数量的填报作出了一些规定,请选择下列规定哪些是符合海关规定的?()
英国首相布莱尔说:“长期以来不干涉主义一直被视为国际秩序中一项重要的原则,但不干涉主义原则,必须在一些重要方面加以限定:国家主权和防止种族灭绝的重要。”基于此理论,美英于1999年轰炸南联盟,2003年发动伊拉克战争体现了这一理论的核心是()。
秘书人员的自我管理包括()。
二次型f(x1,x2,x3)=xTx的矩阵是________.
Weallliketofeelneeded.Butnewresearchsuggestshavingasenseofpurposeisgoodforourhealth,too.Inastudyof7
最新回复
(
0
)