首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build
admin
2017-03-15
102
问题
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build them. On March 26th Taylor Woodrow and George Wimpey agreed upon a £5 billion ($9.8 billion) merger to create the country’s largest housebuilder.
The financial logic of the deal seems hard to fault. Last year the two firms built about 22,000 homes in Britain, a tenth of all completions. Together they will be able to trim costs by more than £70 million a year and they will be in a stronger position in America, where they have operations in Florida, California, Arizona and Texas.
The merger may be the biggest of its kind but it is not the first, as a wave of consolidation sweeps through the industry. Of the country’s ten biggest builders in 2002, only six remain. The rest have been taken over by the three largest firms. Four years ago the top three firms controlled about 20% of the market; now they have around 30%.
The upheaval is transforming an industry that Kate Barker, a member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, heavily criticised in 2004. Ms. Barker was investigating why the supply of new houses had responded so sluggishly to the house-price boom, with completions actually falling to a low of about 175,000 in 2001, although they have since staged a recovery. One reason she highlighted was a fragmented and inefficient industry, whose firms competed not for customers by offering better homes or building them more cheaply but for that scarce British commodity, land with permission to develop. Local firms dominated their regions because they often stood a better chance of gaming the planning system than their national rivals. Quality often suffered because demand was so great that builders could sell all but the shoddiest of homes.
Two things have since changed. First, publicly quoted builders now look vulnerable to takeovers from rivals or private-equity firms because rising house prices have pushed up the value of their land faster than their share prices. This is partly because they value land on their books at its historic purchase price, rather than its current price. So it has often been cheaper to get land by pouncing on a rival than by buying it on the open market, says Kate Moy, an analyst at Teather & Greenwood, a stockbroker.
The second change is that Britain may soon weaken longstanding rules that have preserved "green belts" around towns and cities. Another report by the energetic Ms Barker, released in December, argued that farms and parks will have to be concreted over to provide living space for an extra 209,000 new households each year over the next two decades. One consequence is that firms may soon be able to buy land in suburb-sized chunks.
The potential change has sparked a flurry of interest in land adjoining towns and cities that may be reclassified. That seems to be shifting the balance of power from local builders to large firms with enough capital to buy rights to huge tracts of land. A sign of the shift, says Peter Damesick, head of research at CB Richard Ellis, is that even institutional investors with little previous experience are now getting into the game of speculating on town-edge land.
With interest in land running high the merger between George Wimpey and Taylor Woodrow is unlikely to be the last, if indeed it proceeds. Other builders and private-equity firms are running their slide-rules over the two companies, whose shares have gained on optimism that a counterbid may emerge. And several smaller housebuilders are also expected to fall to bids soon. Given the industry’s generally shoddy customer service, few of them will be missed.
What is Kate Barker’s criticism?
选项
答案
Ms. Barker was investigating why the supply of new houses had responded so sluggishly to the house-price boom, with completions actually falling. It is a fragmented and inefficient industry. Firms competed not for customers but for that scarce British commodity, land with permission to develop. Local firms have a better chance of gaming the planning system than their national rivals. Quality often suffered because demand was great.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/4uSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thisisanabidingcomplaintamongyoungmeninacountrywithasurfeitofconsensus.
Seekingtoframehisnewadministrationasonewithafirmfocusonclosingthegapbetweenchildrenfromaffluentandpoorfami
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
下面你将听到的这段讲话,主题是香港廉政公署和国际刑警组织如何共同合作打击贪污。DistinguishedGuests,LadiesandGentlemen,Firstofall,Iwishtocongratulatethe
女士们,先生们,上午好!中国和马来西亚是友好近邻,两国传统友谊源远流长。中国明朝郑和七下西洋,五次到达马六甲,同当地人民友好交往和互利通商,至今传为佳话。中马建交33年来,两国经贸合作持续快速发展。中国海关统计,2006年两国贸易额达371亿
中美两国建交以来,人民之间的交往不断扩大。两国已缔结了33对友好省州和123对姊妹城市。去年,到中国旅游的美国人多达131万人次。中国赴美探亲、求学、经商的有44万人次。中国有超过18万人曾在美国留学,目前在读的留学生有六万余人。而在中国学习的美国留学生
儿童的生存、保护和发展是提高人口素质的基础,直接关系到一个国家和民族的前途与命运。中华民族素有“携幼”、“爱幼”的传统美德,中国古语“幼吾幼以及人之幼”流传至今。中国政府一向以认真和负责的态度,高度关心和重视儿童的生存、保护和发展,把“提高全民族
A、Solarenergy.B、Fossilfuels.C、Newnuclearplants.D、Nonuclearplants.C根据原文第二段,核问题涉及能源安全和气候变化的问题。前者反对关闭核电站,并且支持开新型核电站,因为废除核
Whatdidthespeakerexpectoflifeinacountrytown?
假期往往是快乐与压力相伴而行。你需要陪伴家人、购买和互赠礼物、拜亲访友、享用节日大餐、打折疯狂采购、组织和参加聚会等。回归到日常生活节奏和相对更安静的工作场所,会使你因缺乏新鲜事物的刺激而精神不振。感到有点失落是一种正常的感觉;一旦回归到日常生活
随机试题
患者女,21岁。因面容不佳,开唇露齿要求治疗。按正畸正颌联合治疗的方案,人院前约2年已行相关的正畸治疗,已经将牙列排齐,现要求手术矫正。检查:患者口唇未能完全闭合,开唇露齿。∠SNA86.6°,∠SNB84.2°。后牙咬合正常,前牙有较好的覆颌覆盖,中线正
患者女,50岁。心悸气短,头晕目眩,活动后症状加重。近29来发热咳嗽,心悸喘促不能平卧,面唇发绀,呼吸困难,汗出,身肿而来急诊。检查:体温38.7℃,血压95/65mmHg,神识昏惑,面唇及指端发绀,两肺底湿性哆音,心尖部可听到3级双期杂音,心率128次
白喉、百口咳、破伤风混合疫苗初种时需
高位水箱用于贮水和稳定水压,水箱通常用( )等材料制作。
铁路简支梁主要采用()方法架设。
下列有关固定资产初始计量的表述中,正确的有()。
在房地产项目前期策划中,分析“建什么”是解决()问题。
按现行规定,在计算应纳税所得额时不得扣除的支出是()。
查明和确认测量仪器是否符合法定要求的程序,被称为()。
简述χ2检验的假设。
最新回复
(
0
)