首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are
admin
2015-01-09
88
问题
When most animals die, nature likes to tidy up by making their bodies disappear. The remains get eaten by scavengers, bones are scattered, tissues rot away and anything left over tends to get destroyed by the elements. Very occasionally, though, these destructive processes get disrupted. This usually happens when the corpse is quickly buried by sediment deposited by a river or blown in by the wind. Then begins a slow process in which minerals precipitate from groundwater into the encased organic material, eventually replacing it with a stony replica: a fossil.
Such was palaeontological doctrine for decades. But in recent years traces of soft tissue, such as blood vessels and bone cells, have been found in some dinosaur fossils. Now researchers have come up with an explanation for how these tissues were preserved for millions of years, which just might make it possible to extract some elements of prehistoric DNA.
That there was more in a fossil than meets the eye emerged in 2005 when Mary Schweitzer, a palaeobiologist at North Carolina State University, found something unusual after her team used acid to dissolve minerals from a fossilised piece of Tyrannosaurus rex bone. Left behind were some fibrous tissue, transparent blood vessels and cells. Many argued that this material must have come from modern bacteria and not a T. rex, since nothing organic could possibly survive the 68m years since the creature had walked the Earth.
In 2012, however, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues revealed the presence of proteins in a dinosaur fossil freshly dug up and carefully protected from any potential contamination. Moreover, one of the proteins the researchers identified could be found only in birds. Since dinosaurs were the ancestors of modern birds, the discovery made it hard to argue that soft-tissue material in the fossil could have come from bacterial contamination. Still, many scientists wondered how such a thing was possible.
In Proceedings of the Royal Society, Dr. Schweitzer and her colleagues collaborated with a team led by Mark Goodwin, a palaeontologist at the University of California, to seek an explanation. Organic material from dinosaur bones was studied using micro x-ray absorption spectroscopy, which allows scientists to examine the structure of matter using intense light beams. This led Dr. Goodwin to notice something remarkable: the organic material in the samples was thickly laced with iron nanoparticles. In animals, iron is most commonly found in blood and this led the researchers to wonder if the iron had come from blood cells that had once flowed through their dinosaur’s veins. Could it have played a part in the preservation of the tissues?
To test this idea, the researchers designed an experiment using freshly slaughtered ostriches which, being large and flightless birds, seemed to be a reasonable modern equivalent to dinosaurs. They extracted blood vessels from the bones of the birds and soaked them in a haemoglobin solution obtained from ruptured ostrich blood cells for 24 hours. The samples were then placed in both a saline solution and sterile distilled water. As a control, some of the blood vessels were put straight into saline solution or water without being pre-soaked in blood.
As expected, the ostrich tissues that went directly into the water and the saline solution fell apart rapidly and were entirely consumed by bacteria or heavily degraded in just three days. The same thing happened to the tissue soaked in haemoglobin and placed in water. But the treated sample in the saline solution remained intact and has stayed that way for two years now, with no signs of bacterial growth.
Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin believe that highly reactive ions known as free radicals, which are produced by iron as it is released from the haemoglobin, interact with the organic tissue causing abnormal chemical bonds to form. These bonds effectively tie proteins in knots at the molecular level, much as the preservative formaldehyde does. This knot-tying makes the proteins unrecognizable to the sorts of bacteria that would normally consume them. This, they theorise, is how the soft tissues manage to survive for millions of years without rotting away.
The iron nanoparticles, however, may be doing more than just preserving tissues. Despite what happens in the science fiction world of "Jurassic Park", no dinosaur DNA has yet been found. The reason for this is that DNA is thought to have a half-life of 521 years, which means that, after that much time, half of the bonds between the proteins that make up DNA have broken apart; after another 521 years, another half have gone, and so on. This leaves very little behind after hundreds of thousands of years yet alone the 65m years or so that stand between humanity and dinosaurs. Even so, Dr. Schweitzer and Dr. Goodwin still wondered if the iron-based preservation process might allow DNA to bypass its typical half-life and last a lot longer.
To find that out, the team used an iron-removal compound known as pyridoxal isonicotinic hydrazide and added four different stains that react only with either DNA itself, or with proteins closely associated with it in organisms other than microbes. Remarkably, in all cases, these specific stains lit up inside the ancient cells in the tissue samples. This hints that something chemically very similar to DNA can remain in a fossil and might yet be hidden precisely where it had resided during life.
In 2012, Dr. Schwaitzer’s discovery of the same protein in dinosaurs and modern birds could possibly prove
选项
A、dinosaurs might be the probable ancestors of modern birds.
B、soft-tissue material could have come from modern bacteria.
C、fossils should be protected from bacterial contamination.
D、organic molecules of dinosaurs could survive in fossils.
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干中2012和Dr.Schweitzer定位至第四段。根据这段开头出现“however”可知,第三段与第四段是转折关系。第三段最后一句提到很多人都认为在恐龙化石中发现的软组织是来自于现代的细菌,没有什么有机质能够存活6.800万年。第四段讲述研究人员发现保护较好的恐龙化石里有一种蛋白质与现代鸟类体内的蛋白质一致。因为第三段与第四段是转折关系,第四段里提到的研究成果是在论证说明与第三段相反的观点,故答案为[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6fdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
FiveCommonMistakesinConversationsandTheirSolutionsI.NotlisteningA.Problem:mostpeopledon’tlisten—waiteagerlyf
AlloftheGreatLakesaresharedbetweentheUnitedStatesandCanadaEXCEPT
Whichofthefollowingisaderivedword?
WhichofthefollowingisNOTcorrectaboutRaulandhiswork?
TheOriginofMoney Intheearlieststagesofman’sdevelopmenthehadnomoreneedofmoneythananimalshave.Hewascontent
TheOriginofMoney Intheearlieststagesofman’sdevelopmenthehadnomoreneedofmoneythananimalshave.Hewascontent
ModernExaminationsIntheschoolsofancienttimes,themostimportantexaminationswerespoken.Usuallythestudentsweres
Sinceitsconception,theEuropeanUnionhasbeenahavenforthoseseekingrefugeofwar,persecutionandpovertyinother【M1】_
WilliamWordsworth,aromanticpoet,advocatedallofthefollowingEXCEPT______.
A、Currentissuesarekeptontheshelves.B、Backissuesareboundtogetherinvolumes.C、Theprocedureofborrowingabackissue
随机试题
A.脂肪瘤B.神经纤维瘤C.皮样囊肿D.皮脂腺囊肿E.表皮样囊肿
患者,女性,35岁,因左足严重外伤后,发生气性坏疽,住院治疗。下列哪项处理不必要
呕血的出血部位是
进行最小成本分析时,其首先应()
A.疫苗B.中成药C.发生严重不良反应的药品D.非临床治疗首选的药品根据《国家基本药物目录管理办法(暂行)》不纳入国家基本药物目录遴选范围的药品是()。
背景材料:某施工单位承担了一化工厂建设工程的机电设备安装任务,进入单机试运行阶段。项目部计划对一台整体安装的大型离心热油泵进行试运行。经检查,试运行的准备工作达到如下条件:(1)有关试运行范围内的工程,除出口管道系统未进行水压试验外,其他工程已按设计文件
关于期货交易和远期交易,下列叙述正确的有()。
刘天公司有一张发票是证明王地公司欠其20万元贷款的凭证,在例行销毁会计档案时,因该发票的保管期已满,该公司便将其与其他会计档案一起销毁,由公司监事会进行了监督。在会计档案的销毁过程中,公司的出纳胡某有很大的过错,董事会便停止了其出纳工作,并由会计档案的保
为了调整图像框的大小以与其中的图形相适应,必须把它的Stretch属性设置为
SarahsaysthatshewillvisitusinthesummerbutIcan’t______her______toadefinitedate.
最新回复
(
0
)