首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
46
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How does the local authority allocate places in popular schools?
选项
答案
Schools can be attended by those who lived nearest. Those who could not afford to live near schools had to go elsewhere. Eight secondary schools have been divided into six areas and two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. The council allocates places randomly.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6ySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ifyouareanathlete,strongabdominalmuscleshelpyouensureastrongbackandfreedomfrommjuryduring________upper-bodymo
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
7月13日晚,在莫斯科国际贸易中心,当国际奥委会主席萨马兰奇宣布北京获得2008年奥运会主办权时,一楼新闻中心的大屏幕,久久定格在一个动人的场面上:何振梁先生眼含热泪,与前来祝贺的国际奥委会委员逐个拥抱。72岁的何振梁说:“北京拿到了奥运会举办
我代表中国政府再次确认,中国政府坚定支持北京申请举办2008年国际奥运会的立场。中国政府尊重并赞赏国际奥运会评估团所作的评估报告,我们据此已制定了在北京举办一次出色奥运会的规划。中国政府将信守在北京陈述报告中所作的所有承诺,并将尽一切努力帮助北京实现其承诺
台湾当局和少数国家宣称台湾因为未能加入WHO影响了防治SARS,这完全违背事实海峡两岸中国人民根连根、心连心。台湾发生SARS疫情后,中国中央政府十分关心,迅速采取了一系列加强两岸交流与合作的措施。//除通过医学专业机构向台湾同行传送有关SARS疫情、防
下面你将听到的是一段有关美国银行在亚洲拓展金融业务的讲话。Ifyouthoughtmultimediawassomethingtobeenjoyedintheprivacyofyourhome,thinkagain
下面你将听到一段回忆邓小平同志的发言。上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的印象。这次大会是文艺界经历十年浩劫后的第一次盛会,也是小平同志复出后第一次代表党中央、国务院同广大文艺工
A、1993.B、1994.C、1995.D、1996.B根据上下文线索对数字进行分析和判断是解题的关键。
我很高兴应邀与各位交流一下不同文化所形成的交际模式。作为一名在中国教学的美国人,我的报告基于我个人的经历和体会。来自不同文化背景的人们往往都认为自己的行为方式是“正常的”。但涉及到说话方式时,有些在本族人看来很自然的话语却被外族人视为荒诞,甚至会
随机试题
Whatisthewoman’ssuggestion?
预热温度可通过()试验来确定。
亚硝酸盐中毒的主要临床症状是
下列各项,不属疔疮走黄原因的是
政府核准的投资项目目录明确规定()的,其核准权限不得下放。
公办幼儿园教师黄某曾有轻微体罚幼儿的行为,园长对其进行了批评教育。没过多久,黄某再次同样体罚幼儿。对于黄某,可由所在教育行政部门依法给予()。
有四个人,他们分别是小偷、强盗、法官、警察。第一个人说:“第二个人不是小偷。”第二个人说:“第三个人是警察。”第三个人说:“第四个人不是法官。”第四个人说:“我不是警察,而且除我之外只有警察会说实话。”如果第四个人说的是实话,那么以下说法正确的是:
设A是三阶矩阵,B是四阶矩阵,且|A|=2,|B|=6,则为().
A、ByfocusingonHemingway’sliteraryawards.B、ByunveilingHemingway’srelationshipwithhisson.C、ByrecordingHemingway’si
FamousChristmasPlacesTherearemany【T1】______traditionsinChristmas.【T1】______ThetwofamousChristmasplacesare:
最新回复
(
0
)