首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
51
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How does the local authority allocate places in popular schools?
选项
答案
Schools can be attended by those who lived nearest. Those who could not afford to live near schools had to go elsewhere. Eight secondary schools have been divided into six areas and two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. The council allocates places randomly.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/6ySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Shewasn’ttrainedasanannyoranythinglikethat.Yetshe’dwalkedrightintothismarvelouschance,withnomotherwhowould
下面你将听到的这段讲话,主题是香港廉政公署和国际刑警组织如何共同合作打击贪污。DistinguishedGuests,LadiesandGentlemen,Firstofall,Iwishtocongratulatethe
下面你将听到一段回忆邓小平同志的发言。上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的印象。这次大会是文艺界经历十年浩劫后的第…次盛会,也是小平同志复出后第一次代表党中央、国务院同广大文艺工
北京奥运会不仅将展示新的激动人心的中国文化,也将体现北京独特的个性与技巧。北京也认为,应从奥林匹克运动中通过广泛咨询,得到技术上的建议。在准备这份报告时,我们咨询了来自悉尼、亚特兰大、巴塞罗那的专家。协商和对话是我们工作的原则。//再次申办以来,
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国教育改革与发展的讲话。党的十一届三中全会以来,随着党和国家工作重点转移到以经济建设为中心。教育在社会主义现代化建设中的地位和作用也越来越重要,我国教育的改革和发展取得了很大的成就。进入20世纪90年代,科学
女士们,先生们:早上好!很荣幸参加此次论坛,与各位共同探讨环保与发展方面的问题。气候变化是环境问题,但归根到底是发展问题。这个问题是在发展进程中出现的,应该在可持续发展框架下解决。只有各方在促进自身发展过程中不断提高技术水平,积极建立适应可持续
与政府存在合约关系的美国公司经常面临这样的选择,究竟购买价格昂贵的本土产品,还是价格低廉的外来产品。如果公司选择购买本土产品,可能会因为未能把价格压低而激怒纳税人。但如果购买外来产品,则可能让美国工人面临失业危机。最近,美国国会通过法律,勒令与政府签过合同
调查者发现每天散步有利于睡眠质量。他们同时也提出只有早上锻炼才对晚上睡觉有利。那些晚上锻炼的人实际上有更多的睡眠问题。一个可能的解释是晚上和早上锻炼相比会影响睡眠质量。早上锻炼可能会让生命钟变得有序,而晚上锻炼则会打乱这种秩序。但是还需要更多的调查来证实这
促进外商投资企业出口便利化,引导外商投资企业充分利用其销售网络扩大出口。鼓励跨国公司在华设立地区总部和研发中心。
随机试题
关于集体劳动合同,根据《劳动合同法》,下列哪些说法是正确的?()
对于全部由汽缸无油润滑压缩机或不喷油的螺杆压缩机组成的压缩空气站,其生产火灾危险性类别应属于()类。
固定资产和流动资产的区别有()
无支护加固坑壁的基坑开挖的条件是()。
用人单位与劳动者协商一致,可以订立无固定期限劳动合同。当出现下列()情形时,劳动者提出或者同意续订、订立劳动合同的,除劳动者提出订立固定期限劳动合同外,应当订立无固定期限劳动合同。
甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为17%。甲公司与收入有关的资料如下:(1)2015年2月25日,因本月完成政府下达技能培训任务,收到财政补助资金10万元存入银行。(2)2015年3月25日,甲公司向丙公司销售一批商品,不含增值税的销售价格为3
从企业选拔应聘人员的全过程来看,人员选拔可分为()。
学习进取
NowthatthedamageinflictedbytheAsianfinancialcrisislookslikeitwascausedbyaneconomicneutronbomb.Thecrisishas
Comparisonsweredrawnbetweenthedevelopmentoftelevisioninthe20thcenturyandthediffusionofprintinginthe15thand1
最新回复
(
0
)