首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Trust Me, I’m a Robot [A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists
Trust Me, I’m a Robot [A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists
admin
2016-04-01
81
问题
Trust Me, I’m a Robot
[A]With robots now emerging from their industrial cages and moving into homes and workplaces, roboticists are concerned about the safety implications beyond the factory floor. To address these concerns, leading robot experts have come together to try to find ways to prevent robots from harming people. Inspired by the Pugwash Conferences—an international group of scientists, academics and activists founded in 1957 to campaign for the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons—the new group of robo-ethicists met earlier this year in Genoa, Italy, and announced their initial findings in March at the European Robotics Symposium in Palermo, Sicily.
[B]"Security and safety are the big concerns," says Henrik Christensen, chairman of the European Robotics Network at the Swedish Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. Should robots that are strong e-nough or heavy enough to crush people be allowed into homes? Is "system malfunction" a justifiable defence for a robotic fighter plane that contravenes(违反)the Geneva Convention and mistakenly fires on innocent civilians?
[C]"These questions may seem hard to understand but in the next few years they will become increasingly relevant," says Dr. Christensen. According to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s World Robotics Survey, in 2002 the number of domestic and service robots more than tripled, nearly surpassing their industrial counterparts. By the end of 2003 there were more than 600,000 robot vacuum cleaners and lawn mowers—a figure predicted to rise to more than 4m by the end of next year. Japanese industrial firms are racing to build humanoid robots to act as domestic helpers for the elderly, and South Korea has set a goal that 100% of households should have domestic robots by 2020. In light of all this, it is crucial that we start to think about safety guidelines now, says Dr. Christensen.
Stop right there
[D]So what exactly is being done to protect us from these mechanical menaces? "Not enough," says Blay Whitby. This is hardly surprising given that the field of "safety-critical computing" is barely a decade old, he says. But things are changing, and researchers are increasingly taking an interest in trying to make robots safer. One approach, which sounds simple enough, is try to program them to avoid contact with people altogether. But this is much harder than it sounds. Getting a robot to navigate across a cluttered room is difficult enough without having to take into account what its various limbs or appendages might bump into along the way.
[E]"Regulating the behaviour of robots is going to become more difficult in the future, since they will increasingly have self-learning mechanisms built into them," says Gianmarco Veruggio. "As a result, their behaviour will become impossible to predict fully," he says, "since they will not be behaving in predefined ways but will learn new behaviour as they go."
[F]Then there is the question of unpredictable failures. What happens if a robot’s motors stop working, or it suffers a system failure just as it is performing heart surgery or handing you a cup of hot coffee? You can, of course, build in redundancy by adding backup systems, says Hirochika Inoue. But this guarantees nothing, he says. "One hundred per cent safety is impossible through technology," says Dr. Inoue. This is because ultimately no matter how thorough you are, you cannot anticipate the unpredictable nature of human behaviour, he says. Or to put it another way, no matter how sophisticated your robot is at avoiding people, people might not always manage to avoid it, and could end up tripping over it and falling down the stairs.
Legal problems
[G]In any case, says Dr. Inoue, the laws really just summarize commonsense principles that are already applied to the design of most modern appliances, both domestic and industrial. Every toaster, lawn mower and mobile phone is designed to minimize the risk of causing injury—yet people still manage to electrocute(电死)themselves, lose fingers or fall out of windows in an effort to get a better signal. At the very least, robots must meet the rigorous safety standards that cover existing products. The question is whether new, robot-specific rules are needed—and, if so, what they should say.
[H]"Making sure robots are safe will be critical," says Colin Angle of iRobot, which has sold over 2m "Roomba" household-vacuuming robots. But he argues that his firm’s robots are, in fact, much safer than some popular toys. "A radio-controlled car controlled by a six-year old is far more dangerous than a Roomba," he says. If you tread on a Roomba, it will not cause you to slip over; instead, a rubber pad on its base grips the floor and prevents it from moving. "Existing regulations will address much of the challenge," says Mr. Angle. "I’m not yet convinced that robots are sufficiently different that they deserve special treatment."
[I]Robot safety is likely to surface in the civil courts as a matter of product liability. "When the first robot carpet-sweeper sucks up a baby, who will be to blame?" asks John Hallam, a professor at the University of Southern Denmark in Odense. If a robot is autonomous and capable of learning, can its designer be held responsible for all its actions? Today the answer to these questions is generally "yes". But as robots grow in complexity it will become a lot less clear cut, he says.
[J]"Right now, no insurance company is prepared to insure robots," says Dr. Inoue. But that will have to change, he says. Last month, Japan’s Ministry of Trade and Industry announced a set of safety guidelines for home and office robots. They will be required to have sensors to help them avoid collisions with humans; to be made from soft and light materials to minimize harm if a collision does occur, and to have an emergency shut-off button. This was largely prompted by a big robot exhibition held last summer, which made the authorities realize that there are safety implications when thousands of people are not just looking at robots, but mingling with them, says Dr. Inoue.
[K]However, the idea that general-purpose robots, capable of learning, will become widespread is wrong, suggests Mr. Angle. It is more likely, he believes, that robots will be relatively dumb machines designed for particular tasks. Rather than a humanoid robot maid, "it’s going to be a heterogeneous(不同种类的)swarm of robots that will take care of the house," he says.
A university professor points out that the complexity of robots may result in the ambiguous product liability.
选项
答案
I
解析
根据题目中的university professor、complexity和product liability定位至I段。该段开头提出机器人可能引发的产品责任应由谁来负,最后一句指出随着机器人变得越来越复杂,答案就不那么明确了。题目信息出自本段,ambiguous是原文less clear cut的近似表达。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/AVL7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Therewasatimewhenbig-leagueuniversitypresidentsreallymattered.TheNewYorkTimescoveredtheireverymove.Presidents,
ThinkorSwim:CanWeHoldBacktheOceans?A)Astheworldgetswarmer,sealevelsarerising.Ithasbeenhappeningatasnail’
Aboutacenturyago,theSwedishphysicalscientistArrheniusproposedalowofclassicalchemistrythatrelateschemicalreacti
Nowadays,computerisbecomingmoreandmorewidelyused.Butpeoplearenotthatfamiliarwithknowledgeofcomputer.Howtoop
AdvantagesofPublicTransportA)AnewstudyconductedfortheWorldBankbyMurdochUniversity’sInstituteforScienceandTec
Moderatedrinkingreducesstrokerisk,studyconfirms.Similartothewayadrinkortwoadayprotectsagainstheartattacks,m
PatientsStruckoffbyGPsA)ThousandsofpatientsarebeingarbitrarilystruckoffbyGPs(普通开业医生)whosaytheycannolongercop
Somepeoplebelievethatyouhavetobeaspecialkindofpersontosellaproduct.Butalthoughitisclearthatasuccessfuls
今天,剪纸(paper—cutting)和古代一样是一项技术性很高的艺术形式,它需要创造力、技巧和经验。无论是简单的还是复杂的形式,每一个设计必须形成一个连续的、完整的(integral)剪纸。仔细研究你会发现中国人形成的那种巧妙的剪法既连接了内部的各个部
A、Satisfying.B、Tough.C、Meaningless.D、Boring.A短文开头提到,ZoeChamberswasasuccessfulPR(PublicRelations)consultantandherl
随机试题
杂交瘤细胞分泌抗体的特性来源于
食积兼有痰多咳喘,宜选用食积兼淤血痛经,宜选用
根据香港特别行政区基本法和澳门特别行政区基本法,下列有关特别行政区立法权的表述哪一项是不正确的?()。
图示电路中,A1、A2、V1、V2均为交流表,用于测量电压或电流的有效值I1、I2、U1、U2,若I1=4A,I2=2A,U1=10V,则电压表V2的读数应为:
与网络计划相比较,横道图进度计划法的特点有()。
会计职业道德与会计法律制度一样,都是以国家强制力作为实施的保障。()
旅游过程中遭遇特殊或突发情况时,导游领队应()。
统计性歧视是指将一个群体的典型特征判断为群体中的个体具有的特征,并将此特征作为对个体特征的评价和描述。根据上述定义,下列选项中属于统计性歧视现象的是()。
对采用迭代或增量开发过程模型开发的产品进行集成测试时最适合采用的集成策略是______。
若x和y是程序中的两个整型变量,则下列if语句中正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)