首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in
admin
2013-09-16
22
问题
Is the professional book reviewer old-fashioned? In a recent Harvard Business School study of nonfiction reviews, assessments in mainstream media outlets and amateur ratings on Amazon largely converged. Assuming we can trust the questionable verdict of mere consensus, surely we could dump the Review section and decide what to read purely by consulting peers online?
Nevertheless, traditional reviewers still serve a function. Few Amazon users will explore a book with the depth of an 800-word review. Supportive quotes are a virtual obligation of the form in print, since especially appraisals of style require substantiation, yet most Amazon reviewers applaud or deplore an author’s prose without providing examples, and you just have to take their word for it. Granted, critics are often scorned as clubby in-fighters either championing their friends or settling old scores.
Yet many Amazon reviewers are just as snotty, overblown and acid as the worst of the "tits" in the Times Literary Supplement. A few small-minded pros may indeed be brown-nosing or out for revenge, but most critics with a shred of integrity refuse to review authors they know. Besides, Amazon suffers from corruption as well; friends-and-family boosters can inflate a listing with flattery; rivals and personal adversaries can pump it with poison. Some review sections may be suspected of assigning books whose publishers advertise in the paper, but Amazon’s emailed "recommendations" are paid for by publishers, no doubt.
As for accuracy of assessment, Amazon reviews tend to gather populist momentum, mix together into a group-think that discourages dissenters. Able to check online for what’s already out there before filing, insecure professional critics are likewise prone to go safely with the popular tide. But the best reviewers will stick their necks out, sometimes defending a misunderstood book against a deluge of denunciation, or objecting that a fashionably crowned "masterpiece" isn’t all it’s cracked up to be.
Still, when executed responsibly, reviewing requires many hours of reading that modest fees don’t begin to compensate. Reviewers are not all grinding an axe or scratching a back. They try to put an author’s work in context, to advance a more constructive argument than "I didn’t like it", and to make a few halfway amusing observations along the way. When they pan a work, hoping to save you time and money, they risk making an enemy of the author for life.
Anyway, why not read the Review section and go online? Then, if both the pros and the amateurs turn out to be wrong, these days you’ve got multiple forums in which to say so. I might defend the reviewing trade, but a handful of haughty hired hands no longer having the last word on books is not a bad thing. According to that Harvard study, professional critics are influenced by awards and hype, while regular readers are less prone to being concealed and more open to new writers. So between the two sources, we should all find the ultimate
Holy Grail.
Which of the following is true according to the first two paragraphs?
选项
A、Professional assessments have been outnumbered by amateur ratings.
B、Professional reviews are abundant in supportive quotes.
C、Amateur reviewers provide concise information in their appraisals.
D、Amateur critics are often criticized of being emotional.
答案
B
解析
[A]选项陷阱在于第一段提及“主流媒体的评论以及亚马逊网站中的业余评论趋同。由此引发了专业评论是否可以摒弃的舆论”,但由此并无法推出“业余评论数多于专业评论数”,故错误。[C]选项陷阱在于第二段第三句末尾提及“业余评论者很少提供实例就对作品加以评价”,但并不能由此推出“业余评沦提供的是简要信息”,故排除。[D]选项陷阱在于第二段末句提及“评论者常被鄙视为排外的内讧者,会为朋友两肋插刀,或算陈年老账”,但由下文(第三段)可知,这是有些人对“专业评论者”的偏见之谈,故本选项错误。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JBO4777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
TheauthorwoulddescribetheReisses’lifeasTheexampleofthepublicistisusedtoshowmostpeople’s
AccordingtoAnneKrueger,long-termgovernmentprotectiongiventosteelcompaniesWecandrawaconclusionfromthetextthat
AccordingtoAnneKrueger,long-termgovernmentprotectiongiventosteelcompaniesWhichofthefollowingcanbeadisadvantag
Accordingtothetext,thecareerofJackLindsayasawritercanbedescribedasAccordingtothesecondparagraph,JackLinds
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
Punishmentdependsasmuchonpoliticsasitdoesoncrime:crimerateshavebeenstableinrecentyearsbutthere’sbeenastri
随机试题
肺癌诊断最有意义的症状是
有关后天性上睑下垂,下列哪项是错误的
A.游走性、多发性大关节损伤,愈后不留畸形B.对称性大小关节炎症,反复发作后关节发生畸形,强直C.大关节损害,有积液,关节活动障碍D.局限单一大关节,红肿热痛明显,伴发热E.链球菌感染后低热,关节痛,红细胞沉降率快,而无心脏损害类风湿
基于租赁收入测算净收益的基本公式为:净收益=潜在毛收入-运营费用。()
根据《建设工程质量管理条例》,在正常使用条件下,下列建设工程中,最低保修期限为2年的是()。
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,2014年4月发生以下业务:(1)购进挖掘机一台,取得的增值税专用发票上注明的价款为60万元,增值税税额为10.20万元。(2)购进一批低值易耗品,取得的增值税专用发票上注明的增值税税额为8万元。(3)采取分期收款方式销售原
注意事项1.申论考试是对应试者阅读理解能力、综合分析能力、提出和解决问题的能力、文字表达能力的测试。2.应试参考时限:阅读资料40分钟,作答110分钟。3.仔细阅读给定资料,按照后面提出的“作答要求”作答。给定资料
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
LastSeptember,apartnershipbetweentheUnitedNationsandthesearchengineGooglewasannounced.AspartoftheUnitedNatio
A、Thebodywilltakeinmoreoxygen.B、Theheartwillbeatmorefrequently.C、Muscleswillbecometenseandthebodywillsweat
最新回复
(
0
)