首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
20
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
Amazon buying Whole Foods shows that the online retailer is now beginning to focus on physical stores.
选项
答案
A
解析
[A]段指出,亚马逊公司收购高端的食品连锁店——全食超市对沃尔玛造成冲击。二者越来越趋同,沃尔玛大力投资技术,亚马逊不仅开了实体书店,而且又在收购实体超市。题干是对亚马逊决策行为的概括总结,故选[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OtP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Becausetheyarenotaccustomedtoit.B、Becausetheyarenotpsychologicallypreparedforit.C、Becausetheirgenesdifferfr
长城(theGreatWall)是中国古代在不同时期为抵御塞北游牧部落联盟侵袭而修筑的规模浩大的军事工程的统称。长城始建于春秋战国时期,历史长达2000多年。今天所指的万里长城多指明代修建的长城,它东起山海关(ShanhaiPass),西至嘉峪关。从
作为中国三大边缘海(marginalsea)之一,黄海的面积约38万平方千米,位于中国大陆与朝鲜半岛之间。黄海生物种类多,水产(aquatic)资源丰富,周边形成了许多良好的渔场,带动了周边城市经济的发展。与此同时,工业污染使黄海的生态环境面临着日益严峻
北京计划未来三年投资7,600亿元治理污染,从减少PM2.5排放入手。这一新公布的计划旨在减少四种主要污染源,包括500多万辆机动车的尾气(exhalast)排放、周边地区燃煤、来自北方的沙尘暴和本地的建筑灰尘。另有850亿元用于新建或升级城市垃圾处理和污
从1999年到2007年,中国人每年有3次长假,五一、十一和春节,每次假期七天,这些假日被称为黄金周。但越是在假期,人们就越忙碌。不得不上班的人们就更忙碌,特别是交通管理部门、旅游和服务行业。回家几乎是长假的另一个任务,尤其是在春节,每个家庭都想团聚。结了
几百年来,昆曲在表演(staging)的通俗性上经历了种种波折,然而从未有人怀疑过它在戏剧领域享有的最高(supreme)地位。昆曲在其他形式的传统戏剧的创立中发挥了指导性的作用,并产生了一批致力于昆曲的追随者(devotee)。昆曲陶冶了中国古代文人的性
符号
学者
G根据动词不定式符号to可知,此处应填动词原形。选项中有defy,rival,slump是动词原形形式。文章一开始说,美元本应走到尽头,快要崩溃。可后面又用maybenot提示美元可能未必没落,后面又提到美元挺过去年的低迷再次大涨。空格后的gloom-a
A、Thelibrarian.B、Thelecturer.C、Thecoordinator.D、Thetutor.C讲座中提到,课程协调人员或来自各系的办公室工作人员将向学生介绍课程要求。因此答案为C)。
随机试题
下面哪个宗敦与其他三个宗教非同源()。
_______作为事物的内部联系,深刻而稳定地反映事物的本来面目;_______只是事物被人们感知的外部形态。
UPS是一家大型的国际快递公司,它除了自身拥有几百架货物运输飞机之外,还租用了几百架货物运输飞机,每天运输量达1000多万件。UPS在世界上建立了10多个航空运输的中转中心,在200多个国家和地区建立了几万个快递中心。UPS公司的员工达到几十万,年营业额
缓进型高血压病恶性高血压
[2005年,第39题]用杂化轨道理论推测下列分子空间构型,其中为平面三角形的是()。
中国民族戏剧种类繁多,文化底蕴深厚,其中流行全国、影响最大的是()。
专题讲座法的优点不包括()。
根据下列资料,回答问题。2001~2008年我国金融机构各项贷款余额变化趋势是()。
我______大家取得的成绩______感到骄傲。
______,itwascompletedontime.
最新回复
(
0
)