首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
25
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
Amazon buying Whole Foods shows that the online retailer is now beginning to focus on physical stores.
选项
答案
A
解析
[A]段指出,亚马逊公司收购高端的食品连锁店——全食超市对沃尔玛造成冲击。二者越来越趋同,沃尔玛大力投资技术,亚马逊不仅开了实体书店,而且又在收购实体超市。题干是对亚马逊决策行为的概括总结,故选[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/OtP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
A、Theywillhavetotakeeverlargerdoses.B、Theywillbecomephysicallyimpaired.C、Theywillsufferfromminordiscomfort.D、
A、Theyarelikeraysofthesunandthesouthernlights.B、Theyrepresentthebeautifulseasonofspring.C、Thereisonlyashor
A、Improvethelearningandtestingprocess.B、Changethewaytestsarestructured.C、Requirestudentstowritetheiranswersins
A、Collectmoneyandhelpnewusers.B、Maintaintheautomatedsystem.C、Stayalerttoanyemergency.D、Walkaroundandguardagai
“一带一路”(theBeltandRoad)指的是“丝绸之路经济带”(theSilkRoadEconomicBelt)和“21世纪海上丝绸之路”(the21stCenturyMaritimeSilkRoad)。“一带一路”旨在借用古
A、Setupyourownwebsite.B、Consultthebank’srepresentatives.C、Trybymakingtransfers.D、Checkyourstatements.BB为录音原文的关键词
A、8-18.B、10-11.C、14-24.D、8-10.C选项都是数值范围,听音时注意抓听数字信息。PaulKelley提到,缺乏睡眠是英国社会的普遍问题,但14至24岁这一年龄层的孩子最缺乏睡眠,故选C。A“8-18岁”是PaulKell
A、Socialfactors.B、Parentingstyles.C、Theparents’age.D、Homecondition.BShakiraSuglia说研究员是在分析了社会人口统计因素比如孩子的年龄和性别之后发现了这一关联。
人口老龄化是指一个国家或地区老年人口增长的现象。生育率下降和人均寿命(lifeexpectancy)延长是导致人口老龄化的两大因素。根据联合国传统标准,一个国家有超过10%的人口超过60岁就被称为老龄化社会。由于计划生育政策的影响,中国大陆已于1999年
自上世纪70年代末以来,中国许多最优秀、最聪明的人才赴海外留学,但学成归国的只有少数。中国人才流失(braindrain)现象严重。在全球化的世界,中国需要越来越多具备国际教育背景的人才。因此国家开展了一系列引进海外人才的项目,成功吸引了越来越多的留学生
随机试题
A.性状B.鉴别C.检查D.含量测定E.附加事项化合物的红外吸收光谱具有和人指纹一样的特征专属性,红外分光光度法收载在
下列关于人大肠内细菌作用的叙述,错误的是
若发现患儿有脑疝先兆,首先应选择的处理措施是()
煎中药时,一般第一煎加水量应淹过药面
和解是指建设工程纠纷当事人在( )的基础上,互相沟通、互相谅解,从而解决纠纷的一种方式。
根据胜任特征结构冰山图,水面以上的部分包括()。
Nomatterhowlowyouconsideryourself,thereisalwayssomeone______youwishingtheywerethathigh.
设f(x)=∫0x2e—t2dt,则f(x)的极值为______,f(x)的拐点坐标为______。
Pleasedon’tdropthatchinavase:it’soneofmyprizepossessions.
A、NotallAmericanscanaffordtravelinginspace.B、NotallAmericansthinkitagoodideatogointospace.C、MostAmericansr
最新回复
(
0
)