2. 考研
  3. For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While pol

For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While pol

admin2019-06-11  54
问题    For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While polls show Britons rate "the countryside" alongside the royal family, Shakespeare and the National Health Service(NHS)as what makes them proudest of their country, this has limited political support.
   A century ago Octavia Hill launched the National Trust not to rescue stylish houses but to save "the beauty of natural places for everyone forever." It was specifically to provide city dwellers with spaces for leisure where they could experience "a refreshing air." Hill’s pressure later led to the creation of national parks and green belts.They don’t make countryside any more, and every year concrete consumes more of it. It needs constant guardianship.
   At the next election none of the big parties seem likely to endorse this sentiment. The Conservatives’ planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over conservation, even authorising "off-plan" building where local people might object. The concept of sustainable development has been defined as prof itable. Labour likewise wants to discontinue local planning where councils oppose development. The Liberal Democrats are silent. Only Ukip, sensing its chance, has sided with those pleading for a more considered ap proach to using green land. Its Campaign to Protect Rural England struck terror into many local Conservative parties.
   The sensible place to build new houses, factories and offices is where people are, in cities and towns where infrastructure is in place.The London agents Stirling Ackroyd recently identified enough sites for half a million houses in the London area alone, with no intrusion on green belt. What is true of London is even truer of the provinces.
   The idea that "housing crisis" equals "concreted meadows" is pure lobby talk. The issue is not the need for more house but, as always, where to put them. Under lobby pressure, George Osborne favours rural new-build against urban renovation and renewal. He favours out-of-town shopping sites against high streets. This is not a free market but a biased one. Rural towns and villages have grown and will always grow. They do so best where building sticks to their edges and respects their character. We do not ruin urban conservation areas. Why ruin rural ones?
   Development should be planned, not let rip. After the Netherlands, Britain is Europe’ s most crowded country. Half a century of town and country planning has enabled it to retain an enviable rural coherence, while still permitting low-density urban living. There is no doubt of the alternative—the corrupted landscapes of southern Portugal, Spain or Ireland. Avoiding this rather than promoting it should unite the left and right of the political spectrum.
According to Paragraph 2, the achievements of the National Trust are now being
选项 A、gradually destroyed.
B、effectively reinforced.
C、largely overshadowed.
D、properly protected.
答案A
解析 细节题。根据关键词Paragraph 2定位到第二段。由该段第一、二句可知，国民信托组织“永 远为大家保存自然美景”，为城市居民提供休闲的空间，但这是发生在一个世纪前。结合第三句 的later和第四句的every year，可知第四、五句更符合题干所指的情况，即“而现在他们不再建设 乡村，每年钢筋混凝土建筑占用了很多乡村土地。乡村需要持续保护”，这其中暗含国民信托组 织的成就被逐渐破坏，如今已经背离了它的初衷。故A项为正确答案。B项“有效地增强”和D 项“得到适当的保护”与原文意思相反。C项“很大程度上被掩盖”不符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Xo9Z777K
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)