首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Our Guilty Secret Next time you pick up a lunchtime sandwich, take a moment to think about where it has come from. Think of t
Our Guilty Secret Next time you pick up a lunchtime sandwich, take a moment to think about where it has come from. Think of t
admin
2018-06-29
122
问题
Our Guilty Secret
Next time you pick up a lunchtime sandwich, take a moment to think about where it has come from. Think of the effort it took to grow the wheat for the bread, to feed the cows to make the cheese, to cultivate the salad from seed. Imagine if you took a few bites from it and simply threw the rest straight in the bin. And if you did that every day, with everything you ate.
Supermarkets and sandwich chains regularly discard a quarter as many sandwiches as they sell. Most of that food is perfectly edible, but little of it is given away to the poor or homeless. Instead, it is destroyed and often sent to landfill. Meanwhile, one billion people go hungry, in a globalized economy.
Consumers are no better. In the United Kingdom alone, according to government estimates, a third of the food we buy goes into the bin. The appalling amount wasted in restaurants and fast-food eateries is another story. Tristram Stuart’s Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal lays bare our wasteful habits, from the farm to shrink-wrapped supermarket packaging and beyond. Stuart, a "
freegan
" and environmental campaigner, has based his book on painstaking research carried out over several years of first-hand experience of foraging in supermarket bins, as well as interviews with company executives and trawls through the meagre data provided by governments and businesses.
The book, with 68 pages of detailed notes and 69 pages of bibliography, bristles with facts but points also to the huge gaps in our knowledge of waste. Most retailers, for instance, prefer not to say how much food they waste, regarding it as a trade secret. Giving it away would put them at a competitive disadvantage, they tell Stuart.
Waste is certainly one of the most important environmental books to come out in years. But it is more than that. It is an indictment of our consumer culture that should make us all feel deeply ashamed. The scale of our food waste problem-and its effect on the developing world-revealed in this book will leave you shocked. And, the author hopes, demanding change.
Avoiding the unnecessary wasting of food is deeply ingrained in most cultures. " Your eyes are bigger than your belly" was how children who helped themselves to more than they could eat were scolded in the Belfast of my childhood. Those who failed to finish, or gorged themselves on too much, would be reminded first of the starving children in Africa then, for good measure, of the Irish famine of the 1840s.
We need not go back so far to discover raw memories of food shortages. Rationing during the second world war and early 1950s left its mark on British life for decades, and famines during and following the war scarred Europe and parts of Asia. In the past two decades, we have seen famines in Africa roll horrifically across our television screens.
Human societies have found ingenious ways to eke out our valuable food resources: to store, pickle and preserve; to find uses for byproducts; to fatten animals on scraps; and even to burn or distil the last residues. Much of our cultural heritage is defined by what we eat. As Stuart reminds us in his chapter-headings — quotations from the Bible, the Koran and folk sayings — we have evolved elaborate rules and customs that embody the imperative to use food efficiently.
Yet our culture of thrift, built up over millennia, seems to have broken down within a few decades into a culture of carelessness. The food wasted each day in the United Kingdom and the United States alone would be enough to alleviate the hunger of 1. 5 billion people — more than the global number of malnourished. How did this happen?
Retailers must shoulder a large part of the blame. The illusion of plenty they like to foster, by constantly refilling shelves and ensuring there is always more food than can be bought in a day, comes in for an excoriating attack. These practices, in turn, force suppliers to overproduce for fear that if the retailer runs out of a product, they will be held to blame.
If this sounds like poor economics, it isn’t. Food has become so cheap in most developed countries that retailers make more profit from selling one more sandwich than they lose from throwing it in the bin if it remains unsold. So over-stacking the shelves is a no-brainer.
Food producers play along because they need to keep their contracts with retailers, and they incorporate the cost of waste into their products.
Stuart records seeing stacks of ready-meals, metres high, being crushed at a food producer’s plant instead of being sold. They had not even passed their "sell by" date — it was just that the retailer decided it did not need so many. They were retailer branded, so could not be sold elsewhere. The edible food had to be landfilled.
Red tape does not help. Confusion over "best before", "sell by" and "display until" dates causes massive waste of edible food. So did the over-regulation, until recently, of food sizes and shapes by the European Union. As a result of a knee-jerk reaction by the UK government after the foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in 2001, food scraps from school kitchens and the like cannot even be given to pigs as swill.
Stuart catalogues appalling waste all through the food supply chain; the farmer whose tasty, blemish-free carrots are only deemed fit to feed animals because they are a mite too bendy to be sold in supermarkets, which assume buyers can only cope with straight vegetables; retail chains that padlock their bins or deliberately spoil the edible contents, for fear their customers will forage in them; consumers who fall for buy-one-get-one-free offers to buy food they will not eat.
Wasting food in rich countries cannot be seen in a vacuum. It has a disastrous effect on the poor. Cheap food is an illusion — the pressure on agricultural land for people to feed themselves and produce for export markets is causing widespread deforestation in the Amazon, south-east Asia and Africa, and soil degradation across the world. Our careless waste pushes up prices for globalized commodities such as grain and rice, forcing poor people to go hungry or beggar themselves.
This book exposes all of these effects clearly, logically and readably. It made me more angry than any book I have read for a long time.
According to the passage, what is the ultimate reason for the massive food waste problem in the United Kingdom and the United States?
选项
A、Because food is not as easy to store, pick and preserve as before.
B、Because consumers’ buying habits have changed a lot after the Second World War.
C、Because retailers always refill their shelves to ensure there is more food than can be bought.
D、Because producers no longer cherish the tradition of thrift and often landfill edible food.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/w2MO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
文化遗产指的是从过去继承而来,在当今保持下去,为未来存留不息的事物。
WelcometotheHarvardexperiencethatawaitsyou.Iwouldalsoliketoextendaspecialwelcometothetransferstudentsandth
A:晓华,特别感谢你邀请我来看京剧,我还从来没看过呢。我有预感,今晚将会是我人生中最精彩刺激的其中一个晚上。跟我讲讲《锁麟囊》这部戏吧,这是个什么故事?B:Sure.I’llquicklywalkyouthroughthestorylin
A、正确B、错误A推理判断题。根据原文Politicallythewaterwaysystemunitedthenationinawayfewhadimaginedpossible,bythemid-1800s,faste
Asalways,IampleasedtobehereattheNationalPressClubformy(1)Speech.ThisistheseventhtimeIhavehadthe(2)to
Earthquakesoftenhappennearvolcanoes,butthisisnotalwaystrue.Thecentersofsomeare(1).Thebottomoftheseasudden
TheLarsenBiceshelfcoveredmorethan3,000squarekilometersandwas(36)metersthickuntilitsnorthernpart(37)inthe1
BlackFridayBlackFridayisthedayfollowingThanksgivingDayintheUnitedStates,oftenregardedasthebeginningofthe
Thepresidentsaysheintendstoworkwiththenomineetobuilduptheimageoftheintelligencecommunity.
Thenewlyreleaseddocumentsinconnectionwiththeprotectionofthelocalenvironmentsirritatedthelocalpeople.
随机试题
科学家在克隆某种家蝇时,改变了家蝇的某单个基因,如此克隆出的家蝇不具有紫外视觉,因为它们缺少使家蝇具有紫外视觉的眼细胞。而同时以常规方式(未改变基因)克隆出的家蝇具有正常的视觉。科学家由此表明,不具有紫外视觉的这种家蝇必定在这个基因上有某种缺陷或损坏。以下
InBritain,peoplehavedifferentaltitudestothepolice.Mostpeoplegenerally【21】themandthejobtheydo—althoughthereare
患病动物体表发热,咳声不爽,声音宏大,鼻流粘涕,呼出气热,口渴喜饮,舌苔薄黄:口色短津,脉象浮数。按照中兽医理论,上述症状属于以下哪种疾病?()
最早明确指出胁痛与肝胆病变相关的医籍是
(2008年)点沿轨迹已知的平面曲线(见图4—36)运动时,其速度大小不变,加速度a应为()。
关于所有者权益的说法,错误的是()。
下列关于结账的说法中错误的是()。
公司分立的动机有()。
钢笔:墨囊:墨水
Asanyhumanbeingknows,manyfactorsgovernwhetherpeoplearehappyorunhappy.Externalcircumstancesareimportant:employe
最新回复
(
0
)