首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
84
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
Why does the author say that "Increasingly, business is serving market rather than markets serving business"(para. 1)? What is the paradox behind such a situation?
选项
答案
common sense + knowledge: financial markets are established to serve business/ with the development of today’s financial market / the opposite situation occurs / use M&A as an easy way "to make a quick buck and please Wall ’street" / manufacturing industry develops/grows with financial market as the focus / paradoxical: originally, the purpose of financial institutions is to provide funds to support and develop manufacturing industry/ today financial units are trying all kinds of means to gain more profits for itself
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wcSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
MaintainingFriendshipinAdolescenceSecondaryschoolcanbea【C1】________placeforadolescentswhodon’thaveabestfrien
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Neverunderestimatehowterrifiedmanypeoplearewhenfacedwiththeprospectofgoingintoasolicitor’soffice.
下面你将听到的是一段有关经济发展的讲话。Iwouldliketocommentontherelationshipbetweenthegrowthoftheworldeconomyandtheroleofmac
Children’ssurvival,protectionandgrowthhaveadirectbearingonacountryandanation’sfutureanddestiny.TheChinesena
A、Theyhavecausedaseriesofpowerfailuresrecently.B、Theyhavebetrayedtrustofthegeneralpublic.C、Theyneedimprovemen
A、Theoildemandgrowthinthesecondquarteris12.3%.B、Restrictionsontruckingandeconomicgrowthwillhelpreducetheoil
A、Itiscausingchangesincurrentsandspeciesinthearea.B、ThemostsouthernpartoftheLarseniceshelfhasbrokenuptoo.
Intheinformationtechnologyindustry,itiswidelyacknowledgedthathowwellITdepartmentsofthefuturecanfulfilltheirb
Intheinformationtechnologyindustry,itiswidelyacknowledgedthathowwellITdepartmentsofthefuturecanfulfilltheirb
随机试题
简述集体决策的优缺点。
挥发油具有的性质除外
某路段压实度检测结果为:平均值=96.3%,标准偏差S=2.2%,则压实度代表值Kr=()%(注:Za=1.645,ta/=0.518)。
【2007年第4题】题26~30:某机械(平稳负载长期工作制)相关参数为:负载转矩TL=1477N.m,启动过程中的最大静阻转矩TLmax=562N.m,要求电动机转速n=2900~3000r/min,传动机械折算到电动机轴上的总飞轮力矩Dmec2=196
承包人应在现场施工开工__________日前向发包人提交包括施工进度计划在内的总体施工组织设计。()
在开放式基金条件下,基金管理人没有基金份额持有人随时要求赎回的压力。()
国务院和地方各级人民政府用于实施义务教育财政拨款的增长比例应当()财政经常性收入的增长比例。
打造中国经济的“升级版”,我们必须告别增长速度的________,迎来均衡发展的百花争妍。越是“较劲”之时,越需要稳中有为,打好转变发展方式这场硬仗。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
十面埋伏:韩信:汉
()临床研究表明,想象脱敏比现场脱敏更有效。
最新回复
(
0
)