首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
55
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
Why does the author say that "Increasingly, business is serving market rather than markets serving business"(para. 1)? What is the paradox behind such a situation?
选项
答案
common sense + knowledge: financial markets are established to serve business/ with the development of today’s financial market / the opposite situation occurs / use M&A as an easy way "to make a quick buck and please Wall ’street" / manufacturing industry develops/grows with financial market as the focus / paradoxical: originally, the purpose of financial institutions is to provide funds to support and develop manufacturing industry/ today financial units are trying all kinds of means to gain more profits for itself
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wcSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
EveryyearBerryBros&Rudd,Britain’soldestwinemerchant,issuesapocket-sizedpricelist.Readingoldcopiesmakesamateur
Asthefederalgovernmentshutdownapproachesthetwo-weekmark,it’sbecomepainfullyapparentthatthepubliccannolongerru
Thearchaeologistsexcavatedtheruins,coveredthembackupagain,andeverything’sbacktothewayitwas.
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Data,largelybaseonstudents’ownreports,probablyunderestimatethescaleoftheproblem.
下面你将听到联合国秘书长接受有关奖项的一段讲话。Mr.Chairman,Excellencies,LadiesandGentlemen,Ishouldlike,firstofall,toonceagainthank
A、Theywitnessedunsuccessfulreforms.B、Theywentbankruptduetocropfailure.C、Theysufferedfrominefficientproduction.D、
A、ThedeathofJapanesefishermancausedtensionbetweenJapanandRussia.B、Thedisputeoverthechainislandsinitiatedthein
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
随机试题
在针对刀具、工件材料等条件确定铣床进给量时,应先确定的是__________。
Windows中的“任务栏”上显示的是______。
肾结核X线检查主要依靠
患者,女性,38岁。因月经量增多半年,乏力、面色苍白、活动后心慌气短1个月来诊。查体:T36.4℃,P100次/分,皮肤、粘膜苍白,巩膜无黄染,心肺(—),肝脾肋下未触及。提示:进一步检查结果示血清铁降低,铁蛋白降低,叶酸水平正常。问题3:应诊断的疾
下列正确表示综合单价计算方法的是( )。
明知是( )所得及其产生的收益,为掩饰、隐瞒其来源和性质,而为其提供资金账户的,没收实施以上犯罪的所得及其产生的收益,处五年以下有期徒刑或者拘役,并处或者单处洗钱数额百分之五以上百分之二十以下罚金。
仓库作业过程实际上包含了实物流过程和信息流过程。实物流是借助于一定的信息来实现的,因此信息流是仓库作业的最基本的运动过程。()
关于假性痴呆的特点,下列说法中不正确的是()。
竞技需要原则的核心是根据世界优秀运动员的竞技能力指标确定训练内容。()
CaringforElderlyParentsCatchesManyUnpreparedA)LastJuly,JulieBaldocchi’smotherhadamassivestrokeandwasparalyzed.
最新回复
(
0
)