首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
admin
2017-03-15
32
问题
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisations proceed, he said, from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage. Apathy is also anti-democratic: democracy requires the informed consent of the governed, and will not last if voters can’t be bothered.
Europe’s leaders also fret that apathy is anti-European. Popular indifference, they fear, leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. Their worry is understandable. The polling evidence, for what it is worth, shows that people who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics. So governments and public institutions naturally seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can: by public-relations campaigns, by exhortations that Europe must dream (Jacques Delors’s admonition against indifference)—or by stunts such as last weekend’s birthday bash in Berlin to mark the 50th anniversary of the EU’s founding Treaty of Rome.
If apathy were indeed a threat to European integration, there would seem to be much reason to worry. Apathy is lolling about everywhere. Voter turnout has fallen in every election to the European Parliament since the institution was created. In the most recent one, in 2004, it slumped below 50%—a lower rate than India’s parliamentary polls. The gap between turnout in national elections and in European ones is widening, so the problem seems especially acute for the EU.
Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has a website where people can file online petitions. It is an unscientific measure of popular concerns, but intriguing nonetheless. A recent petition asking Britain to hold a referendum on any EU constitution got a few thousand electronic signatures. One opposing road pricing got a few million.
It is hard to measure degrees of apathy non-anecdotally because people tend to react badly to polling questions such as "Do you care two hoots about the EU?" But lack of knowledge might be taken as a proxy for lack of concern. Here too the evidence is discouraging. Some three-quarters of Europeans, asked to rate their own knowledge of the EU, say it is modest or non-existent, and this share is rising, not falling.
Yet is it really true that apathy is an obstacle to European integration? A certain amount of apathy is understandable, perhaps inevitable. The EU’s institutions are remote and deliberately complex (deliberately in the sense that they seek to balance pan-European decision-making with national checks and balances). Most voters have no idea who represents them in the European Parliament and would not recognise a European commissioner if one turned up on their doorstep.
There are also reasons why apathy might have grown. Historically, the term entered common use after the First World War, when it was associated with shell-shock and depression. The EU is suffering from the bombshell when French and Dutch voters rejected the draft constitution in 2005. It can also be argued that economic sluggishness and high unemployment (at least until the current recovery) have led to a continent-wide depression.
More important, apathy has its compensations, especially for Europhiles. Without it, European integration would not have gone as far as it has. There was almost no debate about the content of the constitution in the referendum campaigns in Spain or Luxembourg, which approved it by wide margins. The voters who looked most closely at the text were in France and the Netherlands. Similarly, Britain debated the merits of the single currency more extensively than any other country. But Britain stayed out, while others adopted it without discussion.
European integration can proceed without popular enthusiasm because of its character: the EU has a large regulatory component and much integration proceeds through rules-based co-operation. Rules and technical standards are peculiarly unsuited to mobilising popular opinion, whether for or against.
Most people are content to leave them to experts. Integration by regulation proceeds under the voters’ indifferent gaze. In that sense, apathy is the Europhiles’ best friend.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has learned this lesson. The "Berlin declaration" to mark the 50th birthday was written in secret and signed only by the EU’s own representatives: Ms. Merkel as holder of the EU presidency and the heads of the European Commission and Parliament. It seems likely that any revised constitutional treaty- will also be cooked up in semi-secret, with the aim of ratification by national parliaments, not referendums. Let sleeping voters lie.
But there is a further manifestation of apathy to consider: a behavioural condition associated with it, known as "learned helplessness". In 1965 a psychologist, Martin Seligman, subjected two groups of dogs to electric shocks. The first group could end the punishment by pressing a lever. These dogs recovered quickly; in a subsequent experiment, they learned to avoid further shocks by jumping a low wall. The second group had a lever that did nothing. They became apathetic and in the subsequent experiment simply cowered on the electrified floor, unable to escape the shocks. They had "learned helplessness".
In Europe, the treaties of Maastricht and Nice were rejected by Danish and Irish voters, only to be largely implemented later. If the constitution is successfully revived—a big if—it would continue this pattern. Some EU leaders may hope that, if they do this often enough, apathetic voters will learn that they are helpless to stop further integration, even when they want to.
Why do European leaders fret that apathy is anti-European?
选项
答案
Indifference leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. People who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics who seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/wfSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ThecompanyisallbutbannedinAmericabecauseoffearthatitswarescontain"backdoors"forChinesespookstoeavesdropond
Still,takingtogether,China’seffortsareshapingatechnosystemquitedifferentfromanyintheWest.
Chinaisproudofitsachievementsaccomplishedthrough________effortsthroughalltheseyearssinceitsopeningofitsmarket.
我国金融改革的不断深化将为外资银行与中资银行的合作带来新的机遇。银监会鼓励外资银行通过参股中资银行,在业务、客户和市场方面获得突破;同时,在公司治理、内控、风险管理和经营理念方面带来先进的经验和做法,使中、外资银行在合作中共同获得发展。作为深化金
Ifyouthoughtmultimediawassomethingtobeenjoyedintheprivacyofyourhome,thinkagain.Banksareonthefrontierofthe
作为一名运动员、教练员和体育管理者,尤其是作为奥运会的技术官员,我最大的体会是:在奥运会中,没有什么比运动员的利益更重要了。我们整个奥运计划的制定是以运动员需要为中心的。//在做任何决定时,我们都要问一问自己,什么对奥运会和残奥会运动员最有利。在国际单项体
下面你将听到一段有关旅游与科技的讲话。
ThemovieactorArnoldSchwargenegger,whoisrunningforgovernorofCalifornia,belongstotheconservativeDemocraticParty.
Whichcountryexertsmosteffortsineducationalreform?
AIDSisoneofthemaindeadlydiseasesaffectingpeoplearoundtheworld.
随机试题
药物治疗效果的评价实验研究中,常常会采用双盲法收集资料,其目的主要是为了
A.IP的固有特征B.输入到影像读出装置的信号和输出信号之间的关系C.影像处理功能D.检测功能E.影像记录装置CR系统运行的四象限理论,第一象限表示
血清脂肪酶质量测定可采用的方法是
治疗痰气郁结之癫证,应首选
依据《证券投资基金法》的规定,下列属于基金份额持有人职权的是()。Ⅰ.决定基金扩募或者延长基金合同期限Ⅱ.决定更换基金管理人Ⅲ.调整基金管理人和基金托管人的报酬标准Ⅳ.依法转让或者申请赎回持有的基
位于某市区的一家房地产开发公司,2008年度开发建设办公楼一栋,12月与某生产性外商投资企业签订一份购销合同,将办公楼销售给该生产性外商投资企业,销售金额共计1200万元。合同载明,外商投资企业向房地产开发公司支付货币资金900万元,另将一块未作任何开发的
建立团队的四个阶段是()。
对“自知力”的理解正确的是()。
烦恼与焦虑的不同在于()。
合理引导消费行为,形成文明生活方式。消费行为和生活方式看似小事,实则是全社会的大问题,每时每刻都会对资源环境产生直接影响,同时也会间接影响生产方式。我们每个人都要从自己做起,从一点一滴做起。一是树立健康的消费理念。持续开展资源短缺、环境脆弱的国情宣传和深度
最新回复
(
0
)