首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evalu
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evalu
admin
2016-01-02
35
问题
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】
Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evaluation of empirical evidence, they are expected to willingly, even eagerly, abandon cherished beliefs when new evidence undercuts them
. So it is remarkable that so few of the essays in a new book in which scientists answer the question in the title, "What Have You Changed Your Mind About?" express anything like this ideal.
Many of the changes of mind are just changes of opinion or an evolution of values. One contributor, a past supporter of manned spaceflight, now thinks it’ s pointless, while another no longer has moral objections to cognitive enhancement through drugs. Other changes of mind have to do with busted predictions, such as that computer intelligence would soon rival humans’.【F2】
Rare, however, are changes of mind by scientists identified with either side of a controversial issue.
There is no one who rose to fame arguing that a disease is caused by sticky brain plaques and who has now been convinced by evidence that the plaques are mostly innocent bystanders, not culprits. But really, we shouldn’t be surprised.【F3】
Supporters of a particular viewpoint, especially if their reputation is based on the accuracy of that viewpoint, cling to it like a shipwrecked man to floats.
Studies that undermine that position, they say, are fatally flawed.
In truth, no study is perfect, so it would be crazy to abandon an elegant, well-supported theory because one new finding undercuts it.【F4】
But it’ s fascinating how scientists with an intellectual stake in a particular side of a debate tend to see flaws in studies that undercut their dearly held views, and to interpret and even ignore "facts" to fit their views.
No wonder the historian Thomas Kuhn concluded almost 50 years ago that a scientific paradigm falls down only when the last of its powerful adherents dies.
The few essays in which scientists do admit they were wrong—and about something central to their reputation—therefore stand out.【F5】
Physicist Marcelo Gleiser of Dartmouth breaks ranks with almost every physicist since Einstein, and with his own younger self, in now doubting that the laws of nature can be unified in a single elegant formulation.
Gleiser has written dozens of papers proposing routes to the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics through everything from superstrings to extra dimensions, but now concedes that "all attempts so far have failed." Unification may be esthetically appealing, but it’ s not how nature works.
【F4】
选项
答案
但有趣的是,与某一争论的特定一方存在智力利害关系的科学家如何倾向于从动摇自己深信的观点的研究中发现破绽,并解释甚至忽略“事实”以使其符合自己的观点。
解析
该句主干是it’s fascinating,it作形式主语,真正主语是后面的how…。主语从句的主干是scientists tend to see flaws in studies and(tend)to interpret and even ignore“facts”。with an intel—lectual stake in a particular side of a debate作后置定语修饰scientists。that undercut their dearly held views为定语从句修饰studies。to fit their views作目的状语。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/xXsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
科学研究的方法与人类思维的关系——1993年英译汉及详解【F1】Themethodofscientificinvestigationisnothingbuttheexpressionofthenecessarymodeof
贝多芬与勇气——2014年英译汉及详解Musicmeansdifferentthingstodifferentpeopleandsometimesevendifferentthingstothesamepersonat
欧洲的电视媒体——2005年英译汉及详解ItisnoteasytotalkabouttheroleofthemassmediainthisoverwhelminglysignificantphaseinEurope
探究科研领域的发展趋势——1996年英译汉及详解Thedifferencesinrelativegrowthofvariousareasofscientificresearchhaveseveralcauses.【F1】Som
【F1】TheAmericansociologistTalcottParsonsbelievedthatthetwomostimportantfunctionsofthemodernfamilyaretheprimary
Doesthelanguagewespeakdeterminehowhealthyandrichwewillbe?NewresearchbyKeithChenofYaleBusinessSchoolsuggest
"Whyarehumanssosmart?"isaquestionthatfascinatesscientists.TadeuszKawecki,anevolutionarybiologistattheUniversit
"Whyarehumanssosmart?"isaquestionthatfascinatesscientists.TadeuszKawecki,anevolutionarybiologistattheUniversit
Someoftoday’smostcutting-edgetechnologyisnowbeingusedtohelpstudentswithspecialneeds.Nolongerjusttheprovince
NextmonthBritonswillhaveyetmoresmartphonestochoosefrom,whendevicesfromWiko,atwo-year-oldFrenchcompany,goons
随机试题
氧气瓶阀有哪几种?
小明想到一个处理废水的好办法。
男,25岁,突感上腹部剧痛。检查:血压130/80mmHg,脉搏110队/分,板样腹,肠鸣音消失。血红蛋白120g/L,血白细胞数8.0×109/L。以下提示病情危险的是
多少张床位以上的医院设护理部主任、科护士长、护士长三级负责制
城市规划纲要的主要内容是()。
温州的县级市有()。
关于Word中的项目符号和编号,以下说明不正确的是()。
放弃是一种智慧,获取是一种财富,对此你怎么看?
从社会学的眼光看,重复博弈的结果之一可能是博弈双方由陌生人变为熟人,甚至成为_________,并发展出超越当下经济互动关系之外的其他社会关系。假如当前的经济巨动关系只不过是发生在双方之间的多种社会交往之中的一种,其他社会交往就可能_________当事人
There’ssimplepremisebehindwhatLarryMyersdoesforaliving:Ifyoucansmellit,youcanfindit.Myersisthefounderof
最新回复
(
0
)