首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on
Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on
admin
2020-01-15
42
问题
Whether it is called animal testing, animal experimentation or animal research, it refers to the experimentation carried out on animals. It is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works. While supporters believe it is a necessary practice, those opposed to animal testing believe that it involves the torture and suffering of animals. The following are opinions from two sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from two sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Doctors
Ted (the US) : Animal testing has improved our medicines. Animals live in an ecosystem with us. And in an ecosystem, living things interact to survive. Sometimes there are sacrifices made for another species to live. Just like this one. How many of you have ever had medicine before? Everyone, right? Think about before you had that medicine, were you in pain? Had a fever? Sneezing? Cough or sore throat? Or something even worse? The drugs that you used to cure yourself were tested on animals. Animals will not go extinct because of this. The animals that are used give birth to a big litter of babies and are bred just for this purpose. Everybody says that testing on animals is not accurate, but look at all the medicine that came out of it.
Sally (the UK) : It should be tested because we need to stay healthy. If we don’t test it on animals we will not be healthy. And it’s an important part of medical research. We need to make sure human patients get a safe dose of medication. Patients feel safe if they know that their medications have been tested on animals beforehand.
Jessica ( Mongolia) : Suppose there is some virus spreading over a large area, doctors and scientists are trying their best to invent a drug, and they do so, but without animal testing the drug is launched in the market. These drugs may have adverse reactions and about billions of people may die from them. Would this be good? The only answer is no. We can’t sacrifice billions of people for just one animal.
Zoophilists
Susan Borowski (Spain) : Animals should not be tested on drugs and medication because it can harm them badly and they might die! These animals are harmless and we are damaging them by testing our stupid products on them. What if they die one day? It will be the scientists’ fault! Animals deserve better care.
Laura (the UK) : Animals have feelings. It is just wrong of a person to do this to animals. They have the right to live! Just like us. Why will we take that right away? We are here in this earth to live and not to harm earth creatures. Millions of animals are dying for the cause that they don’t have a fault for. The animals are suffering burns, cancer, blind, force-fed chemicals, and more.
Austrorus (India) : If people keep doing this, soon animals are going to be extinct. It could affect the world in many ways. And it’s so hard for animals. And people love having animals as pets. We should not use drugs on them!
TedM (Russia) : Instead of testing it on animals who also have families like us, we can test it on those people who are sentenced to death because they are undeserving to live and why should they die easily. They have given pain, and they should also get that pain back. So, these prisoners are perfect to be tested drugs on.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
Should Animals Be Used to Test Drugs and Medications? Animal testing is a controversial subject. Those against it would reply that animal testing creates pain and suffering. Those who support it may define it as experimentation that uses animals to benefit humans. Different attitudes lead to different definition of the practice. The divergence is large between doctors and zoophilists. The doctors think that animal testing helps to improve our medicines. Also, we need to test the drugs first on animals for the safe dose of medication and the adverse reactions before they are used on humans. Besides, all living things interact with each other in an ecosystem, and animals in tests will not go extinct. These claims face fierce oppositions from zoophilists, however. They argue that we are depriving the living rights of animals. And animals are suffering pains and dying just for the selfishness of humans. An eccentric suggestion is to test the drugs on prisoners sentenced to death, instead of animals. Weighing the benefits and harms, I have enough reasons to support animal experiment on medical research. First, to abandon animal testing means to expose all human life in risk. Every available medical treatment today has, to some degree, involved animal testing virtually. Everything from toiletries to medications has likely been tested on animals at some point prior to their distribution. It is unrealistic to cut ourselves off from all these daily products. Second, the worry on the extinction of the animals doesn’t exist. Animals used in experiments are mostly bred specifically for testing. There are commercial establishments that sell animals specifically for use in animal testing facilities. Last but not least, some strict requirements for testing on animals have been issued, thanks to the objections of the animal rights activists. These regulations have, to a large extent, ruled certain concerns over the animals and protected the dignity of the animals. In a word, it would be irresponsible to ban animal testing before the perfect substitutes for animals are discovered in experimental procedures. For now, I firmly hold the opinion that human lives take the priority.
解析
本题讨论是否应该使用动物进行医药测试的问题,命题是社会各界关注的焦点。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的两种观点,并发表自己的看法。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明社会现象,并提出论点:使用动物进行医药测试具有争议;第二段简要阐述来自医生和动物保护者的两种观点;第三段重点阐述自己对这一问题的看法,并说明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/yybK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fundingpublictransitisoneofthebiggestproblemsfacingcitiestoday.Oftenthetroubleisthatafewhigh-cost,low-rider
A、Howwelook.B、Howwecopewithstress.C、Howwebehave.D、Howcreativelywethink.B句(1)中女士提到,我们所吃的食物能够直接影响我们的感受、处理压力的方式、思维方式
A、Onehalf.B、Twofifths.C、Onequarter.D、10%to15%.D本题设题点在数字处。根据句(2)可知,国家卫生研究所提到,总人口中有10%到16%的人患有慢性失眠症,因此[D]为答案。
Massmediaismediathatisintendedforalargeaudience.Itmaytaketheformofbroadcastmedia,asincaseoftelevisionan
还是成都的那些旧街道,我跟着你一步一步地走过平坦的石板路,我望着你的背影,心里安慰地想:父亲还很康健呢。一种幸福的感觉使我的全身发热了。我那时不会知道我是在梦中,也忘记了二十五年来的艰苦日子。在戏园里,我坐在你旁边,看台上的武戏,你还详细地给我解
回想起小学四年级以后的日子,便有如进入了一层一层安静的重雾,浓密的闷雾里,甚至没有港口传来的船笛声。那是几束黄灯偶尔挣破大气而带来的一种朦胧,照着鬼影般一团团重叠的小孩,孩子们留着后颈被剃青的西瓜皮发型,一群几近半盲的瞎子,伸着手在幽暗中摸索,摸一些并不知
保护绿水青山,留住蓝天白云,是全体人民福祉所系,也是对子孙后代义不容辞的责任。必须始终把建设生态文明、保护生态环境放在突出位置,强化科学治理,推广使用技术,实行最严格的源头保护制度,严守生态保护红线,以重点区域和关键领域为抓手,实施重大战略性生态工程,充分
中华民族的传统文化博大精深、源远流长。早在2000多年前,就产生了以孔孟为代表的儒家学说和以老庄为代表的道家学说,以及其他许多在中国思想史上有地位的学说流派,这就是有名的“诸子百家”。从孔夫子到孙中山,中华名族传统文化有它的许多珍贵品质,许多人民性和民主性
譬如说,当我们正在旅游胜地享受假期,却忽然接到老板的电话,告诉我们客户或工作方面出了麻烦……
中华民族的传统文化博大精深、源远流长。早在2000多年前,就产生了以孔孟为代表的儒家学说和以老庄为代表的道家学说,以及其他许多在中国思想史上有地位的学说流派,这就是有名的“诸子百家”。从孔夫子到孙中山,中华名族传统文化有它的许多珍贵品质,许多人民性和民主性
随机试题
间接用于产品生产的各项费用,应先在“辅助生产成本”和“制造费用”账户中归集,然后通过一定的分配方法计入各类成本计算对象的“基本生产成本”账户。
患者项背强急,四肢麻木,抽搦或筋惕肉瞤,直视口噤,头目昏眩,自汗,神疲气短,或低热。舌质淡或舌红无苔,脉细数。其证属
患者,男,70岁。右肢体运动障碍2天。CT示左中央区低密度,内有斑片样高密度。最可能的诊断是
如题图所示,由预埋板和对称于力作用线配置的弯折锚筋与直锚筋共同承受剪力的预埋件,已知承受的剪力V=220kN,直锚筋直径d=14mm,共4根.弯折钢筋与预埋钢板板面间的夹角α=30°,直锚筋间的距离b1和b均为100mm,弯折钢筋之间的距离b2=100mm
为了防止结构位移变形、干缩与温差变形时产生裂缝,屋面刚性防水层的施工不宜()。
符合通报标题撰写要求的是()。
劳务派遣协议使劳务派遣机构与用工单位双方建立起()。
黑格尔哲学的“合理内核”是()。
教育目的是实施教育方针的途径。
Broken:DreamsofRuralPeaceItwasduskinTubneyWoods,deepinruralOxfordshire.Thebirdsweresingingattheendofanoth
最新回复
(
0
)