首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evalu
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evalu
admin
2016-01-02
64
问题
Scientists are supposed to change their minds.【F1】
Having adopted their views on scientific questions based on an objective evaluation of empirical evidence, they are expected to willingly, even eagerly, abandon cherished beliefs when new evidence undercuts them
. So it is remarkable that so few of the essays in a new book in which scientists answer the question in the title, "What Have You Changed Your Mind About?" express anything like this ideal.
Many of the changes of mind are just changes of opinion or an evolution of values. One contributor, a past supporter of manned spaceflight, now thinks it’ s pointless, while another no longer has moral objections to cognitive enhancement through drugs. Other changes of mind have to do with busted predictions, such as that computer intelligence would soon rival humans’.【F2】
Rare, however, are changes of mind by scientists identified with either side of a controversial issue.
There is no one who rose to fame arguing that a disease is caused by sticky brain plaques and who has now been convinced by evidence that the plaques are mostly innocent bystanders, not culprits. But really, we shouldn’t be surprised.【F3】
Supporters of a particular viewpoint, especially if their reputation is based on the accuracy of that viewpoint, cling to it like a shipwrecked man to floats.
Studies that undermine that position, they say, are fatally flawed.
In truth, no study is perfect, so it would be crazy to abandon an elegant, well-supported theory because one new finding undercuts it.【F4】
But it’ s fascinating how scientists with an intellectual stake in a particular side of a debate tend to see flaws in studies that undercut their dearly held views, and to interpret and even ignore "facts" to fit their views.
No wonder the historian Thomas Kuhn concluded almost 50 years ago that a scientific paradigm falls down only when the last of its powerful adherents dies.
The few essays in which scientists do admit they were wrong—and about something central to their reputation—therefore stand out.【F5】
Physicist Marcelo Gleiser of Dartmouth breaks ranks with almost every physicist since Einstein, and with his own younger self, in now doubting that the laws of nature can be unified in a single elegant formulation.
Gleiser has written dozens of papers proposing routes to the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics through everything from superstrings to extra dimensions, but now concedes that "all attempts so far have failed." Unification may be esthetically appealing, but it’ s not how nature works.
【F1】
选项
答案
人们认为,科学家基于对实验证据的客观评估、就科学问题形成自己的观点之后.一旦出现动摇这些观点的新证据,他们会欣然地、甚至急切地抛弃原先珍视的观念。
解析
该句主干是they are expected to abandon cherished beliefs。Having adopted their views on scientific questions…为现在分词结构作状语,based on an objective evaluation of empirical evidence为过去分词短语作方式状语,修饰adopted。when引导时间状语从句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/3XsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
萨皮尔一沃尔夫假说的形成——2004年英译汉及详解Therelationoflanguageandmindhasinterestedphilosophersformanycenturies.【F1】TheGreeksassum
CompaniesarelobbyinghardtoremovetheEU’straceabilityandlabelingpoliciesforproductscontainingGMingredients.Br
Doesthelanguagewespeakdeterminehowhealthyandrichwewillbe?NewresearchbyKeithChenofYaleBusinessSchoolsuggest
HalfacenturybeforeCharlesDarwinpublishedOntheOriginofSpecies,theFrenchnaturalistJean-BaptisteLamarckoutlinedhi
[A]Monitoryouralcoholuse[B]Payattentiontotablemanners[C]Don’tbeagossip[D]Networkwithhigher-ups[E]Keeptheconver
[A]Monitoryouralcoholuse[B]Payattentiontotablemanners[C]Don’tbeagossip[D]Networkwithhigher-ups[E]Keeptheconver
NextmonthBritonswillhaveyetmoresmartphonestochoosefrom,whendevicesfromWiko,atwo-year-oldFrenchcompany,goons
Takemuchofwhatyouknowabouthowthebestexecutivesmakedecisions.Now,forgetit.Forinstance,weall"know"thattight
Biologicaldiversity—orbiodiversity—isthetermgiventototalvarietyandcomplexityandinteractionsofalllifeonEarth.Th
Telecommuting,Internetshoppingandonlinemeetingsmaysaveenergyascomparedwithin-personalternatives,butasthedigital
随机试题
企业理念识别系统(MI)堪称企业之心。主要包括()等基本内容。
女,55岁,胸痛伴咯血丝痰1周,胸部CT如图,最可能的诊断为
患者,男,49岁。混合痔环切术后,为防止出血,禁止灌肠的时间是术后
甲上市公司准备增选独立董事,下列人员中,不得担任甲公司独立董事的有()。
县级以上人民政府应当根据需要设立流浪乞讨人员救助站,救助站应当根据受助人员的需要提供救助。对照有关法规关于救助站救助内容的规定,下列说法正确的是()
材料:某教师在“抗日战争”的教学中,引用了一段日军第59师团第54旅团第110大队伍岛健司的口述材料:“我想起了1943年在渤海湾的沿海地带生活的事情。我们如果见了男人的话,就抓过打,残酷地加以杀害。但是见了女人,就要羞辱她。如果她们哀
《教育漫话》是哪位教育家的教育论著?()
公开发行新股必须经国务院证券监督管理机构核准。()
曼彻斯特大学的研究人员称,全球气温普遍上升超过2摄氏度,食物的供给就会岌岌可危,其中首当其冲的就是农作物的产量会受到严重影响。当温度上升超过4摄氏度时,大米的产量会下降30%。而随着温度的持续升高,粮价将大幅上涨,这势必又会带动畜产品、肉类价格的上涨,全球
Whatarethespeakersdoingastheconversationbegins?
最新回复
(
0
)