首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
55
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Inspiteofillhealthandaphysicaldisabilitythatthreatenedhercareer.CarsonMcCullerscompletedanovelinthesummerof
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
7月13日晚,在莫斯科国际贸易中心,当国际奥委会主席萨马兰奇宣布北京获得2008年奥运会主办权时,一楼新闻中心的大屏幕,久久定格在一个动人的场面上:何振梁先生眼含热泪,与前来祝贺的国际奥委会委员逐个拥抱。72岁的何振梁说:“北京拿到了奥运会举办
当前,国际金融危机已从局部发展到全球,从发达国家传导到新兴市场国家,从金融领域扩散到实体经济领域,给世界各国经济发展和人民生活带来严重影响。值此关键时刻,我们在这里共同探讨维护国际金融稳定、促进世界经济增长的举措,具有十分重要的意义。//我们正在
自父母离异后,我从一个娇生惯养的孩子,转变成了一个通情达理的大学生。父母离异前,我指望着母亲服侍我。她为我洗衣、做饭、洗碗,甚至为我铺床。我15岁时父亲离开了我们,之后一切都变了。母亲找了份全职工作供养我们,我成了家里有时间做家务的人。另外,我在周末兼职挣
虽然中国出口增长率明年将会下降,良好的投资环境、低价优质的劳动力仍将会继续吸引外国投资者。这是短期因素不能扭转的趋势。但是,实际的直接外国投资用于企业合并和兼并的不到10%,大部分的投资都用于新企业的建立。这意味着中国还有很多空间引导外资融入国营企业的改组
随机试题
在一国国际收支中具有突出重要地位的是()
营养不良性钙化常见于
心源性猝死最早出现的是
下列哪组穴是俞募配穴
【背景资料】某水利枢纽工程由电站、溢洪道和土坝组成。主坝为均质土坝,上游设干砌石护坡,下游设草皮护坡和堆石排水体,坝顶设碎石路,工程实施过程中发生下述事件:事件一:项目法人委托该工程质量监督机构对大坝填筑按《水利水电基本建设工程单元工程质量评定标准》规
在H国2000年进行的人口普查中,婚姻状况分为四种:未婚,已婚,离婚和丧偶。其中,已婚分为正常婚姻和分居;分居分为合法分居和非法分居;非法分居指分居者与人非法同居;非法同居指无婚姻关系的异性之间的同居。普查显示,非法同居的分居者中,女性比男性多100万。
美国大众文化的欧洲化已经达到了25年前无法想象的程度。那时没有多少人在用餐时喝葡萄酒,也没有人饮用进口的矿泉水,最令人诧异的是,美国人竟然会花钱去看英式足球比赛。这种观点的提出源于一份报告,该报告指出美国州际高速公路与运输官员协会刚刚采纳了一项提议,准备开
InCambodia,thechoiceofaspouseisacomplexonefortheyoungmale.Itmayinvolvenotonlyhisparentsandhisfriends,【C
在C++中,实现封装性需借助于()。
与非理性价格波动风险紧密联系、互为因果的风险有()。
最新回复
(
0
)