首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
60
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Duringemploymenttheemployeecouldnotuseordisclosethisinformationwithoutbreachingthedutyoffidelity.However,once
Thiscommercial________wasthesubjectofcontroversyonthelegislationmeeting.
女士们、先生们:我非常高兴能利用英中贸协年会的机会向英国工商界朋友们致以诚挚的问候。多年来,英中贸协一直关心和支持中英关系发展,是堪称两国友好交流的桥梁和互利合作的纽带。在此,我谨对英中贸协及诸位长期为促进中英经贸合作所做的不懈努力和杰出贡献表示
在中关建交25周年前夕,我应布什总统的邀请正式访问贵国。纽约是我访美的第一站,在这里能与各位新老朋友欢聚一堂,我感到很高兴。在此我要特别感谢美国银行家协会的盛情款待,向多年来为推动中美经贸合作做出积极贡献的各位朋友表示敬意!并通过你们向伟大的美国人民致以诚
到1999年春季,美国环境保护署和中国国家环境保护总局(SEPA)的官员签订了一个协议备忘录,建立了两国在排污权交易和酸雨控制方面的双边示范项目。在签字仪式上召开的国际研讨会上,与会者通过介绍了解了美国环境保护协会与中国地方城市之间的合作项目,这也是到目前
今晚我要祝福你的俱乐部生日快乐。现在,我自己已经到达生命中的一个阶段,在这个阶段里我记住的是我的生日而不是我几岁了。我想我已经到了所谓的中年。这个阶段,我们往往摄人对我们有益的食物,而不是我们喜欢的食物。我为你们的俱乐部感到自豪,因为它是为我们上了年纪的人
当前,世界多极化和经济全球化深入发展,科学技术突飞猛进,给亚洲的发展带来新的机遇,也带来新的挑战。亚洲有49个国家和地区,大部分是发展中经济体。经济全球化,有利于它们更多地获得资金,尤其是跨国企业的投资,加快经济发展和结构调整;有利于它们更好地利用自身优势
随机试题
以美国的学制为蓝本,沿用至解放初期的学制是()
红细胞中还原型谷胱甘肽不足,而导致溶血,原因是缺乏
患者,女,16岁,昨日因饮食过饱,后即感冒,脘胀满疼痛。嗳腐吞酸,大便不爽,苔厚腻,脉滑。应首先选用何方治疗
老年性阴道炎的治疗可在阴道局部使用
行业标准CJJ1-2008规定,无机结合料稳定基层应达到()等要求。
行政许可的实施程序规定了实施行政许可的( )。
学校产生于()。
班主任开展教育工作的前提和基础是()。
【2015年重庆开县.单选】()水平决定教育的规模和速度。
2017年4月18日,C919大型客机首飞放飞评审会在中国商飞公司试飞中心召开。经过严格评审,评审委员会一致同意,C919大型客机首架机通过首飞放飞评审,待完成全部高速滑行测试后,可择机开展首飞。5月5日下午,我国首款按照最新国际适航标准研制的干线民用飞机
最新回复
(
0
)