首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
64
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Often,capriciousnessisthereasongivenfordoingnothing.Flexibleworkingisanaddedopportunitytoallowstaffattheshar
当年为了实现乌拉圭回合,各个成员费了很大劲儿,但事后的结果并不乐观,世界经济更不平衡,两极分化越加严重。面对这一现象,发展中国家不能容忍,发达国家也感到了危机。正因为如此,大家才把多哈回合定为发展回合。这是WTO历史上巨大的进步,也是各个成员富有远见的选择
尊敬的梅莱斯•泽纳维总理阁下,尊敬的各位国家元首和政府首脑阁下,尊敬的非洲联盟委员会主席阿尔法•乌马尔•科纳雷阁下,各位代表团团长、部长和大使阁下,女士们,先生们://我很高兴来到亚的斯亚贝巴,与出席中非合
本次会议是信息社会世界峰会的首次政府间筹备会议,既要处理程序性问题,又要处理实质性问题。开好筹备会,是峰会取得成功的重要保证。中国代表团愿就峰会筹备工作谈以下几点看法://一、要高度重视知识和人才问题。在未来信息社会中,知识和技能是促进经济发展的
中国制造2025中国制造2025是中国政府经过深思熟虑做出的重大战略性决策,是基于中国工业发展水平和未来发展目标所做出的。而很多人对中国制造2025有些误解,认为中国这个政策出台,是不再购买国外的装备。但事实并非如此,企业是自愿决定购买
我很高兴应邀与各位交流一下不同文化所形成的交际模式。作为一名在中国教学的美国人,我的报告基于我个人的经历和体会。来自不同文化背景的人们往往都认为自己的行为方式是“正常的”。但涉及到说话方式时,有些在本族人看来很自然的话语却被外族人视为荒诞,甚至会
自父母离异后,我从一个娇生惯养的孩子,转变成了一个通情达理的大学生。父母离异前,我指望着母亲服侍我。她为我洗衣、做饭、洗碗,甚至为我铺床。我15岁时父亲离开了我们,之后一切都变了。母亲找了份全职工作供养我们,我成了家里有时间做家务的人。另外,我在周末兼职挣
随机试题
甲、乙两个投资项目收益率的标准离差分别是10%和15%,投资比重分别为40%、60%,两种资产的相关系数为0.8,则由这两个投资项目组成的投资组合的标准离差为【】
前置胎盘的恰当处理是
产业政策的核心是(),特别是促进产业结构优化和升级问题。
打开Word2003,新建一个空白文档“文档1”,当执行“文件”菜单中的“保存”命令后()。
【资料】中国公民王先生是甲公司(非上市公司)的股东,2015年11月收入情况如下:(1)取得甲公司为其购买的价值120万元的小轿车一辆,该车所有权登记在王先生名下;(2)取得其月初购入的A上市公司股票红利0.2万元;
下列表述中属于社会本位论的观点的是()。
根据新课程改革的理念,教师应该是学生学习活动的()。①合作者②控制者③支配者④管理者
关于中国的世界遗产,下列说法错误的是:
Somehousesaredesignedtobesmart.Othershavesmartdesigns.AnexampleofthesecondtypeofhousewonanAwardofExcellen
RisingbrightandearlyonaSaturdayusedtobeamatterofsurvivalinGermany.【C1】______the1990smostshopsclosedforthe
最新回复
(
0
)