首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
35
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
What is "fair-banding"?
选项
答案
Working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Everydepartmenthashadtheirbudget________duringthefinancialcrisis.
InDecember,WaymoLLC,theleadingdriverlesscarcompany,broughtouttheworld’sfirstcommercialrobo-taxiservice.Butfor
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
从目前全球经济发展看,一些重要的特点和趋势值得我们高度重视。主要是:科技进步日新月异,前所未有地提高了人们认识和把握宏观世界和微观世界的能力,为人类推动生产力发展和创造美好生活提供了强大支持;国际生产要素优化重组和产业转移加快,各国经济发展更加紧密地联系在
下面你将听到的是一段有关中国教育改革与发展的讲话。党的十一届三中全会以来,随着党和国家工作重点转移到以经济建设为中心。教育在社会主义现代化建设中的地位和作用也越来越重要,我国教育的改革和发展取得了很大的成就。进入20世纪90年代,科学
女士们,先生们:早上好!很荣幸参加此次论坛,与各位共同探讨环保与发展方面的问题。气候变化是环境问题,但归根到底是发展问题。这个问题是在发展进程中出现的,应该在可持续发展框架下解决。只有各方在促进自身发展过程中不断提高技术水平,积极建立适应可持续
冷战以后世界上仅有一个超级大国,势力均衡因此也就不存在了。这种状况是否会持续很久呢?答案取决于你是乐观主义者,还是悲观主义者。还取决于强权政治是否会被纳入受全球单一文化观念影响的某种立宪制世界秩序中。不过,在可预见的未来,第三次世界大战似乎不太可
与政府存在合约关系的美国公司经常面临这样的选择,究竟购买价格昂贵的本土产品,还是价格低廉的外来产品。如果公司选择购买本土产品,可能会因为未能把价格压低而激怒纳税人。但如果购买外来产品,则可能让美国工人面临失业危机。最近,美国国会通过法律,勒令与政府签过合同
随机试题
某公司年初所有者权益为5000万元,本年发放现金股利600万元,本年配股等集资金2000万元,年末所有者权益为9000万元。则该年资本保值增值率为()。
2015年,全国居民人均可支配收入21966元,按常住地分,城镇居民人均可支配收入31195元,比上年增长8.2%;农村居民人均可支配收入11422元,比上年增长8.9%;农民工月均收入水平3072元,比上年增长7.2%;全国居民人均消费支出15
利斯特林起初是作为消毒杀菌剂来销售的,经过一段时间后销售停滞,企业后来提出其作为“漱口药”的新观念,加大宣传与促销,使该产品的销路大为改观。以上案例采用的是()
一少女不慎被踢伤外阴部,疼痛难忍,血肿最易发生在
临床上毛果芸香碱主要用于治疗
A、相杀B、相须C、相使D、相恶E、相反人参配莱菔子属
A.全书9卷,81篇B.全书10卷,22篇C.全书3卷,25篇D.全书8卷,73篇E.全书10卷《金匮要略》
若工程监理单位与施工承包单位串通,谋取非法利益,给建设单位造成损失的,应当由()。
1921年,彼得格勒市民鲍里斯在日记中写道:“今年的春天是这样的惨淡,农村地区的饥民逃到了城市,可是作为市民的我们也不能做到食物自给呀。”造成日记中这种现象的原因是()。
HighlightingIsaWasteofTimeA)Inaworldasfast-changingandfullofinformationasourown,everyoneofus—fromschoolchi
最新回复
(
0
)