首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2023-01-17
46
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection Modem scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp wedges, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams. Clams were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modem clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths—some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens—clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, evolution________.
选项
A、may not necessarily be based on competition
B、occurs through the differential survival of competing genes
C、is the consequence of the struggle for resources among species
D、is the product of heredity, environmental stimuli, and past experiences
答案
A
解析
根据文中第4段第2句可知,这两位科学家认为物种竞争没有那么达尔文想象的频繁,也提出了另一种与竞争无关的可能性,所以A项“不一定基于竞争”正确。C项“是不同物种争夺资源的结果”,这是达尔文的观点,与古和卡的理论刚好相悖,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UNcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
二元函数z=的定义域为().
ZoeBuhlerwasscheduledforanultrasoundappointmentontheSeptembermorningwhenAustralianpoliceenteredherhome.Thepre
Foratleastadecade,introvertactivistshavebeencallingforarevolution:remaketheextrovert-dominatedworkplace.Create
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
AdecadeagobiologistsidentifiedaremoteprotectedareainnorthernLaos,calledNamEt-PhouLouey,asthecountry’sprobable
Peoplehavespeculatedforcenturiesaboutafuturewithoutwork.Todayisnodifferent,withacademics,writers,andactivists
TheUnitedStatesiswidelyrecognizedtohaveaprivateeconomybecauseprivatelyownedbusinessesplay【C1】________roles.TheA
Mammalsvaryenormouslyinsize,fromweighinglessthanapennytomeasuringmorethanthreeschoolbusesinlength.Somegroup
阅读以下关于开放式嵌入式软件架构设计的相关描述,回答问题。【说明】某公司一直从事宇航系统研制任务,随着宇航产品综合化、网络化技术发展的需要,公司的业务量急剧增加,研制新的软件架构已迫在眉睫。公司架构师王工广泛调研了多种现代架构的基础,建议采用基于FAC
六十整岁望七十岁如攀高山。不料七十岁居然过了。又想八十岁是难于上青天,可望不可即了。岂知八十岁又过了。老汉今年八十二矣。这是照传统算法,务虑不务实。现在不是提倡尊重传统吗?老年多半能悟道。孔子说“天下有道”。老子说“道可道”。《圣经》说“太初有道
随机试题
下列影响国际商务谈判的因素中,最难把握的是()
毛泽东思想形成和发展的根本依据是()
审核并发给医疗机构《麻醉药品、第一类精神药品购用印鉴卡》的部门是
关于室内环境污染物浓度现场检测,方法不正确的是()。
二进制中只有0和1两个数字符号。()
WhenonelooksbackuponthefifteenhundredyearsthatarethelirespanoftheEnglishlanguage,heshouldbeabletonoticea
言语沟通的形式可以分为________。
直观行动思维的工具是()。
下列哪项药品可以做广告?()
在关系模型中,把数据看成一个二维表,每一个二维表称为一个______。
最新回复
(
0
)