首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2023-01-17
44
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection Modem scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp wedges, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams. Clams were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modem clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths—some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens—clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, evolution________.
选项
A、may not necessarily be based on competition
B、occurs through the differential survival of competing genes
C、is the consequence of the struggle for resources among species
D、is the product of heredity, environmental stimuli, and past experiences
答案
A
解析
根据文中第4段第2句可知,这两位科学家认为物种竞争没有那么达尔文想象的频繁,也提出了另一种与竞争无关的可能性,所以A项“不一定基于竞争”正确。C项“是不同物种争夺资源的结果”,这是达尔文的观点,与古和卡的理论刚好相悖,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UNcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Inthepast20yearsalone,threecoronaviruseshavecausedmajordiseaseoutbreaks.FirstcametheoriginalSARSvirusin2002.
ManyAmericanshavebeenfeedingababyaspirinonceaday,believingitwouldprotectthemfromaheartattack,astroke,ande
[A]Whattodoasastudent?[B]Variousdefinitionsofplagiarism[C]Ideasshouldalwaysbesourced[D]Ignorance
Peoplehavespeculatedforcenturiesaboutafuturewithoutwork.Todayisnodifferent,withacademics,writers,andactivists
Whilemanyworkersarewillingtolearnnewskillsorcompletelyretraintoimprovetheirfutureemployability,fewfeeltheyar
Peekthroughtheinspectionwindowsofthenearly100three-dimensional(3D)printersquietlymakingthingsatRedEye,acompany
Peekthroughtheinspectionwindowsofthenearly100three-dimensional(3D)printersquietlymakingthingsatRedEye,acompany
Nowadays,amateurphotographyhasbecomeatroublingissue.Citizensofrichcountrieshavegotusedtobeingwatchedbyclosed-
创建型模式支持对象的创建,该模式允许在系统中创建对象,而不需要在代码中标识特定类的类型,这样用户就不需要编写大量、复杂的代码来初始化对象。在不指定具体类的情况下,____①____模式为创建一系列相关或相互依赖的对象提供了一个接口。____②____模式
使用VC++2010打开考生文件夹下progl中的解决方案。此解决方案的项目中包含一个源程序文件progl.c。在此程序中,规定输入的字符串中只包含字母和"*"。编写函数fun(),其功能是删除字符串中所有的"*"。编写函数时,不得使用c语言提供的字符串函
随机试题
试述认知障碍的主要表现形式。
经产妇,34岁,妊娠37周,无原因出现无痛性阴道出血,经卧床休息,给予镇静剂未见明显好转,阴道仍有活动性出血,初步诊断为前置胎盘,为了决定分娩方式,拟确定前置胎盘类型,应进行
患者,女性,70岁,无牙颌。全口义齿摘戴时疼痛,定位明确,戴人后无明显不适。其疼痛的原因是
全血在保存过程中,发生了“保存损害",增加了一些有害物质,其中有
资产负债表日后,企业利润分配方案中拟分配的以及经审议批准宣告发放的股利或利润,不确认为资产负债表日的负债,也不在附注中披露。()
事业单位以社会公益为主要发展取向,具有社会和()双重属性。
不平坦的道路
Windows 2000是基于下列( )版本的Windows操作系统发展而来的。
下列关于类模板的描述中,错误的是()。
【B1】【B9】
最新回复
(
0
)