首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2023-01-17
47
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolutioa What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection Modem scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp wedges, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams. Clams were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modem clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths—some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens—clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
According to Gould and Calloway’s theory, evolution________.
选项
A、may not necessarily be based on competition
B、occurs through the differential survival of competing genes
C、is the consequence of the struggle for resources among species
D、is the product of heredity, environmental stimuli, and past experiences
答案
A
解析
根据文中第4段第2句可知,这两位科学家认为物种竞争没有那么达尔文想象的频繁,也提出了另一种与竞争无关的可能性,所以A项“不一定基于竞争”正确。C项“是不同物种争夺资源的结果”,这是达尔文的观点,与古和卡的理论刚好相悖,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UNcD777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Peoplegenerallyassumethatwhentheyconsideranotherpersona"friend,"thatpersonalsothinksofthemasafriend,whichme
Inthepast20yearsalone,threecoronaviruseshavecausedmajordiseaseoutbreaks.FirstcametheoriginalSARSvirusin2002.
Everyonewantstobeauthentic.Youwanttobetruetoyourself,notaslavishfollowerofsocialexpectations.Youwantto"liv
Whilemanyworkersarewillingtolearnnewskillsorcompletelyretraintoimprovetheirfutureemployability,fewfeeltheyar
Peekthroughtheinspectionwindowsofthenearly100three-dimensional(3D)printersquietlymakingthingsatRedEye,acompany
TheaverageBritishpeoplegetsix-and-a-halfhours’sleepanight,accordingtotheSleepCouncil.Ithasbeenknownforsomet
Theworldisonthetopofastaggeringriseinthenumberofoldpeople,andtheywilllivelongerthaneverbefore.【C1】_______
Itiscommonknowledgethathealthyfoodssuchasfruitsandvegetablescontaincertainnutrientsthatpromotegoodhealth—namel
使用VC++2010打开考生文件夹下blank1中的解决方案。此解决方案的项目中包含一个源程序文件blank1.c。在此程序中,函数fun()的功能是判定形参a所指的N×N(规定N为奇数)的矩阵是否是"幻方",若是,函数返回值为1;若不是,函数返回值为0。
A、Theycoulddrivetheinsectsaway.B、Theycouldkeeptheplantswellwatered.C、Theycouldbuilddevicestotrapinsects.D、Th
随机试题
德育目标是教育目标在人的()方面的总体规格要求。
所有的作物都是自野生品种演化而来,这意味着,用达尔文主义的说法就是,野生品种在漫长的时间里获得了生存所需的适应能力。然而在驯化与种植中,发生了遗传侵蚀,这种适应能力也遭受损失,甚至其野生祖先也可能灭绝;于是今天的很多作物一旦突然间无人种植,就会直接消亡。
在规定条件下,仪表绝对误差的最大值不超过量程±0.4%的是()级仪表。
(I)《华盛顿邮报》(E)《华尔街日报》
下列关于我国土地制度的表述中,正确的有()
结账前要进行的检查包括()。
对他们来说,像以前那样经常见到这样的美景不容易了。
家庭治疗者注重()的测评与调整。
类风湿关节炎极具特异性的自身抗体是
已知A是n阶实对称矩阵,满足A2一3A+2E=O,且B=A2一2A+3E.(Ⅰ)求B-1;(Ⅱ)证明:B正定.
最新回复
(
0
)