首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack eac
admin
2011-01-10
43
问题
In politics, in the courts, even on the ubiquitous TV talkshow, it is good form to pick an intellectual fight. People attack each other- hurl insults, even- and it counts as logical argument. I cannot understand it.
It seems that our society favours a kind of ritualized aggression. Everywhere you look, in newspapers and on television, issues are presented using the terminology of war and conflict. We hear of battles, duels and disputes. We see things in terms of winners and losers, victors and victims.
The problem is society’s unquestioning belief in the advantages of the debate as a way of solving disagreements, even proving right from wrong. Our brainwashing begins early at school, when the brightest pupils are co-opted onto the debating system. They get there because they can think up a good argument to support their case. Once on the debate team, they learn that they earn bonus points for the skill with which they verbally attack, or insult, the opposing team. They win if they can successfully convince the audience that they are right, even if the case they are arguing is clearly nonsensual. They do this by proving themselves to be stronger, brighter, more outrageous, even.
The training in this adversarial approach continues at our tertiary institutions. The standard way to present an academic paper, for instance, is to take up an opposing argument to something expressed by another academic. The paper must set out to prove the other person wrong. This is not at all the same thing as reading the original paper with an open mind and discovering that you disagree with it.
The reverence for the adversarial approach spills over into all areas of life. Instead of answering their critics, politicians learn to sidestep negative comments and turn the point around to an attack on accusers. Defense lawyers argue the case for their clients even when they suspect they may be guilty. And ordinary people use the same tactics—just listen to your teenager next time you pull him up for coming home late. You can be sure a stream of abuse will flow about your own time—keeping, your irritating habits, your history of bad parenting.
Unfortunately, the smarter your kid, the better his or her argument against you will be. You’ll be upset, but you’ll comfort yourself that those teenage monsters of yours will one day turn into mature, though adults who can look after themselves—by which you mean, of course, they will be able to argue their way out of sticky situations.
It’s not that you should never use angry words, or take up a position in opposition to someone or something. There are certainly times when one should take a stand, and in such cases strong words are quite appropriate: if you witness injustice, for instance, or feel passionately about another’s folly. Mockery—so cruel when practised on the innocent—can be very useful in such situations. There is no better way to bring down a tyrant than to mock him mercilessly.
What I dislike is the automatic assumption most people have when it comes to disagreements: they should attack, abuse, preferably overpower their opponent, at whatever the cost. The approach is so ingrained that "compromise" has become a dirty word. We feel guilty if we are conciliatory rather than confrontational. We have trained ourselves, or been brainwashed into believing, that to be pleasant is a sign of weakness.
But just think how easy it can be to persuade a "difficult" person to be considerate of you or your wished when you are pleasant to them, and unthreatening. Give them a way out of a potentially aggressive situation without losing face, and they will oblige you willingly.
Discuss a subject without taking an adversarial position and you will find the other person happy to explore the possibilities with you. I’m prepared to bet on it. You’ll get closer to the truth of the matter than you would by going to each other hammer and tongs.
The writer’s main point is______.
选项
A、compromising
B、no debating
C、discussing
D、no fighting
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/fTcO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ofalltheareasoflearningthemostimportantisthedevelopmentofattitudes.Emotionalreactionsaswellaslogicalthought
Forthesuccessoftheproject,thecompanyshould______themostoftheopportunitiesathand.
IntheUnitedStatesandinmanyothercountriesaroundtheworld,therearefourmainwaysforpeopletobe【C1】______aboutdeve
Theamazingsuccessofhumansasa【C1】______istheresultoftheevolutionarydevelopmentofourbrainswhichhasled,amongoth
Itisknowntoallthatchildreninthisregionhavestrong______toswimminginsummerbecauseofthehotweather.
Thedichotomypostulatedbymanybetweenidealismandrealismisoneofthestandardclichesoftheongoingdebateoverinternat
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
InterpersonalRelationshipsInthelast25yearswehavewitnessedanimpressivegrowthinourknowledgeaboutemotionsande
地球大气层正在转暖,这种迹象日趋明显,这向人们提出了一个重大问题,即地球变暖在多大程度上应归咎于人类活动,又在多大程度上是自然原因造成的?气候变化科学家们正在寻求答案。经过对全球气候变化的全方位定期科学评估,科学家们断定全球气候受到了“显而易见的人为影响”
A、BecauseChina’sairlineshavemadegreatprofitstheseyears.B、Becausethepriceofplaneshasgonedown.C、Becausemoreand
随机试题
男,50岁,颈增粗20年,近一年消瘦10kg,并有心悸。体检发现叹侧甲状腺多个结节。基础代谢率+31%,2小时内甲状腺摄碘29%。最有效的治疗是
腹痛患儿未明确诊断前,禁用的药物是()。
2013年3月,王某在一次抢劫过程中,因行人报案,被市公安局侦查人员当场抓获。从侦查阶段到审判阶段,王某对被指控的抢劫罪没有异议。2013年6月15日。甲市基层人民法院正式受理了此案,并认为王某可能被判处3年以下有期徒刑,遂直接决定适用简易程序进行审理。2
下列几种厌氧消化工艺中,工艺上与好氧的完全混合活性污泥法相类似的是()。
某工程网络计划中,工作N的自由时差为5天,计划执行过程中检查发现,工作N的工作时间延后了3天,其他工作均正常,此时()。
某公司有总经理、副总经理等高层管理人员5人,高层管理人员、中层管理人员和基层管理人员的管理幅度分别为5人、6人、10人。现在该公司通过加强管理人员培训,改进管理方式,在管理上大胆放权,这样既调动了基层管理人员的工作积极性,又节省了高层人员的时间,同时,该公
对视频会议的会场布置要求正确的有()。
Verne’sAccuratePreviewoftheFutureSincethebeginningoftime,manhasbeeninterestedinthemoon.TheRomansdesigned
A、Footballgame.B、Theyarecooking.C、It’sfive.A
Ofallthe【C1】______ofagoodnight’ssleep,dreamsseemtobeleastwithinourcontrol.Indreams,awindowopensintoaworld
最新回复
(
0
)