首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
To snoop, or not to snoop? Some experts claim that parents have a duty to hack into their children’s social media to ensure thei
To snoop, or not to snoop? Some experts claim that parents have a duty to hack into their children’s social media to ensure thei
admin
2021-02-24
25
问题
To snoop, or not to snoop? Some experts claim that parents have a duty to hack into their children’s social media to ensure their safety. But this suggestion is accused by many of violating children’s privacy. Should parents monitor their children’s social media? The following are opinions from two sides. Read the excerpts carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the opinions from both sides;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Parents
Nicolas: I think that we do because what if our kids are getting threatened or stalked and they are too scared to tell us and then it would be too late to fix. Also I think yes because the Internet is very dangerous and we should help.
Kelly: I believe that technology should be part of family life with the sort of rules and expectations that you have for table manners or bedtimes. I wouldn’t demand that my children hand over their phones for me to check, but I would expect to be their Facebook friend, and to have ongoing conversations with them about potential dangers. I also think it’s my role as a parent to keep up-to-date with any new technology that my children might want to use.
Emma, mother to Laura, 17: A couple of years ago, I discovered Laura had self-harmed. I knew something was very wrong but she wouldn’t open up to me and refused to accept she had a problem. Out of desperation I logged on to her computer when she was at school and found her Facebook page. It was so dark and depressing that I realized she was clinically depressed. I made a doctor’s appointment for her. It took a while for Laura to accept that my "snooping" had been necessary but I would advise any parent to do the same.
Children
Olivia: Obviously parents don’t trust their kids. If they can’t trust them, they may as well completely run their lives, telling them what not to do online, what to eat, doing this isn’t helping. If they can’t trust their kids, they’ll never learn for themselves what’s right or what’s not right. Teenagers and parents relationships should be based on trust.
Lois: Parents should trust their teenagers not to do inappropriate things online, and on social media. If they don’t trust each other, then there will be a problem in their bond. If there is a weak bond, then there will be a chasm between them. They will have a hard time understanding each other and then they will get into arguments and fights. This is a critical time in teenagers’ life. If they learn that this is how to treat their own children in the future then the cycle of the arguments and fights will continue.
David: Plain bad parenting. If children do not have the confidence to open up to their parents about being cyber bullied or think parents should not "spy" on their children, parents should work on building the relationship between them, making kids at ease to confide in them more.
Dania: Children do not have access to the parents’ social media, so why should parents have access to their children’s social media? If parents think there is something wrong they can talk about it; there is no need to invade children’s privacy.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
Should Parents Monitor Their Children’s Social Media? Now that children have greater access than ever to the Internet, not just at home, but on mobile devices wherever they go, parents are facing a new set of dilemmas: should they monitor children’s social media to keep an eye, or should teens be allowed a realm of privacy away from the prying eyes of parents? Quite a number of people insist on the necessity of parents monitoring children’s social media. To begin with, they maintain that the Internet poses many a threat to the children while they interact with others via social media, therefore it’s the parents’ responsibility to keep track of their children’s online activity for the sake of their safety. Secondly, many children especially teenagers may restrain from their parents while articulating their concerns and worries on their social media, so social media is the only access through which parents can be aware of their children’s authentic feelings. However, others hold views the other way around. They strongly oppose to parents’ monitoring children’s social media, arguing that it intrudes children’s privacy. Besides, in order to be conscious of their children’s whereabouts, parents should resort to other effective measures, such as building a mutually trusted relationship, rather than snooping on their social media. Balancing the views from the two sides, I’m inclined to agree with the latter one. On the one hand, I don’t think it’s a wise move to monitor children’s social media as a precaution against potential danger. If parents rely on technology to monitor their kids or prevent them from engaging in online risks, they are getting a false sense of security. Any determined kid can defeat any technology parents put out there. Instead of knowing more about children, parents are pushing them away by monitoring their privacy. On the other hand, clever and intuitive, if teens want to circumvent the intention of a social network to bend it to their needs, they will. Therefore, instead of using technology to snoop on children’s digital activities, it will be more beneficial for parents to discuss boundaries and appropriate online behavior with their children and to dole out features sparingly if children are abiding by the rules. To conclude, parents’ monitoring their children’s social media results in the estranging relationship between them, therefore some open talks with the children pinning down the rules regarding to using social media are more conducive to the protection of the children’s safety.
解析
本题讨论父母是否应该监控子女的网络社交媒体的问题,属于社会生活类话题。本题要求简要概括所给材料中的两种观点,并发表自己的看法。在具体的写作过程中,考生可以开篇点明社会现象,并提出论题:父母是否应该监控子女的网络社交媒体;第二段简要阐述正反两种观点;第三段重点阐述自己对这一问题的看法,并说明理由;最后一段总结全文,重申观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/oBIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、Williamhasnoenthusiasmofpaintingnow.B、Mrs.HarrisishappyaboutWilliams’decision.C、William’smotherrunsherownbu
Thethirdisproximity,postureandechoing.Proximityreferstothe【T1】______betweenspeakers.Thiscanindicateanumberoft
A、Becausetheyarereadby110,000studentsthisyear.B、Becausetheyaredesignedforstudentsin361colleges.C、Becausethey
ConversationalSkillsPeoplewhousuallymakeusfeelcomfortableinconversationsaregoodtalkers.Andtheyhavesomething
Althoughthefirstyearisreallyimportantforlanguagedevelopmentinchildren,majorlearningcontinuesthroughoutachild’s
泊珍到偏远小镇的育幼院把生在那里养到1岁的孩子接回来。但泊珍看他第一眼,仿似一声雷劈头而来。令她晕头胀脑,这1岁的孩子脸型长得如此熟悉,她心里的第一道声音是,不能带回去!痛苦纠聚心中,眉心发烫发热,胸口郁闷难展,胃里一股气冲喉而上。院长说这孩子发
沪港股票市场互通(沪港通)不仅是内地资本市场的利好,对香港而言,沪港通也是块“肥肉”。香港能在内地资本市场开发和人民币国际化过程中扮演“独家中介”角色,是因为香港目前还是最大的人民币境外交易中心。但香港的中心地位并非不可撼动。10月14日,英国政府宣布发行
AuniquesocialphenomenonexistsexclusivelyinChina—chunyun,orSpringFestivalTravelRush.Thefollowingexcerptisabouth
人生之路谁不走?只是走路时别忽略了一路的良辰美景。一个人工作的地方是小的,居住的家是小的,社交的圈子是小的,有的人就越来越不满这缺乏变化的单调。有的人却总是怡然自得,随遇而安。世界浩渺,一个人只能居于一隅。比海洋大的是天空,比天空大的是心灵,因为这小小的心
这地方是个长潭的转折处,两岸是高大壁立千丈的山,山头上长着小小竹子,长年翠色逼人。这时节两山只剩余一抹深黑,赖天空微明勾画出一个轮廓。但在黄昏里看来如一种奇迹的,都是两岸高处去水已三千丈上下的吊脚楼。这些房子莫不俨然悬挂在半空中,借着黄昏的余光,还可以把这
随机试题
已知f(x)=+e-2x-,求f(x)的表达式。
1936~1939年,日本猩红热A群链球菌中以4型为主,1956~1957年以6型为主,1964年又以4型为主,1967年以后以12型为主,该病的变化称为我国野鼠型出血热的发病率从每年10月至次年1月升高,此种现象称为
A.45~60分钟B.20~30分钟C.15~20分钟D.40~60分钟E.30~60分钟芳香性饮片沸后煎煮时间一般为()
女性,53岁。胆囊炎非手术疗法好转。恢复期肝功能正常,饮食应给
若评价时间不够,河流一级评价至少应调查()。
对非金融机构买卖基金份额的差价收入不征收营业税。( )
提高法定存款准备金率,会使商业银行的信用能力()。
根据以下资料,回答以下小题。2011年,我国进口商品总额达17434.7亿美元,同比增长24.9%。其中进口初级产品6043.8亿美元,同比增长39.3%;进口机电产品7532.9亿美元,同比增长14.1%。同年,机电产品出口10855.9亿美元
细胞是人体新陈代谢的主要场所,下图所示是肝细胞中所进行的有关化学变化,请据图回答: ⑤和⑥的场所分别是______和______。
【北京航空航天大学2010翻译硕士】以“当我走进考场的时候”为题,用汉语写一篇不少于800字的议论文。
最新回复
(
0
)