首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Democracy is so much a part of our national identity that it almost seems a birthright. But the irony is that, even as we hope t
Democracy is so much a part of our national identity that it almost seems a birthright. But the irony is that, even as we hope t
admin
2010-01-10
64
问题
Democracy is so much a part of our national identity that it almost seems a birthright. But the irony is that, even as we hope to spread democracy elsewhere, we risk preaching the virtues of a form of government we no longer practice ourselves. The upcoming elections, our proudest celebration of democracy, will highlight some of the threats to our government "by the people".
Technically, every vote is counted. But will the ballot you cast really make a difference? Not likely, unless you live in one of about 17 battleground states where the contest between President Bush and Senator Kerry could easily go either way. If you come from a state that is already locked up by one of the parties and most of us do — your vote won’t carry much weight. That’s because of our idiosyncratic electoral college system.
Rather than being elected directly by the people, the President would be chosen by a group of electors appointed by the state legislatures — with the number of electors determined by the state’s total number of representatives to Congress and U.S. Senators. By allotting two Senators to each state, our founders enabled small states to wield an influence greater than their populations alone would warrant, ensuring that the most populous states wouldn’t decide every Presidential election. But here’s the rub: When it comes to those electoral votes, it’s winner-take-all (except in Maine, and Nebraska). Get more popular votes, even if only by one, and you grab all of the state’s electoral votes.
There’s yet another way that the electoral system undermines our vote. In 2000, the Presidential campaigns largely ignore the 33 states that weren’t up for grabs. Even California, Texas and New York — states offering many electoral votes but little partisan competition — fell by the wayside. If victory or defeat depended on the popular vote, then candidates would have to work for each one. Instead, they decide which states are in play, and go after the voter there. They rarely visit other places and the majority of us don’t experience a real campaign.
Here’s one idea that could help us in future Presidential elections. In a number of countries, they have a system of direct popular vote, but with a critical provision, in the event that no one wins by a majority, they hold an "instant runoff". That’s done by allowing voters to register not only their first choice among the candidates, but also their second and third, if a run-off is needed (say, if the winner among several candidates has less than 50 percent of vote). You can eliminate the candidate with the lowest tally, and transfer his or her supporters to the second choice on their ballots. This process can play out until there is a clear victor. This system give weight to every person’s vote — something our system of electors will never do. Only a Constitutional amendment, however, can bring about this change.
Which of the following statements is NOT true, according to the passage?
选项
A、Some popular votes may carry more weight than others.
B、The outcome of the election depends on the electoral votes.
C、One can win the election only by getting more popular votes.
D、The electoral system prevents the most populous states from deciding every election.
答案
C
解析
这是道上下文理解题。解题句是第三段的“By allotting two Senators to each state, our founders enabled small states to wield an influence greater than their populations alone would warrant, ensuring that the most populous states wouldn t decide every Presidential election. But here s the rub: When it comes to those electoral votes, it’s winner-take-all(except in Maine, and Nebraska). Get more popular votes, even if only by one, and you grab all of the state s electoral votes.”通过分配每个州两名参议员的名额,我们的先辈们使得各个小州拥有比它们人口比例更大的影响力,保证了即使人口众多的大州也不能左右总统选举的结果。但是矛盾的是,在决定选举票数的时候,得票多者却可以独揽胜局(除了马里兰和内布拉斯加州)。只要获得哪怕多一张的选票,你就左右了整个州的选票结果。像这道题目考生有时可以考虑用排除法,只要找到文中和题目的四个选项中的一项是相悖的,那么就可以找到该题的答案。此题的第三个选项“one can win the election only by getting more popular votes”和原文的“Get more popular votes, even if only by one, and you grab all of the state’s electoral votes.”选项的意思是只有得到更多的普通选票候选者才能赢得选举和原文的“获得更多的普通选票,即使是多一张,根据胜利者全拿的原则,他就可以得到这个选区的所有选票”意思是不一样的。因此可以排除了C,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/o6cO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
WhatarethechallengesfacingmultinationalsthatwanttobuildtheirbrandsinChina?—Ithinkthefirstthingisignorance.T
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
Thereportmanagedtogetan______interviewwiththePrimeMinister.
Sino-foreigneducationalprogramonbusinessispopularinChinanow,andthedemandforhighlevelinterpretationisgreat.
Manyoftheelectricandelectronicproductswepurchaseandconsumetodayarewhatsomeindustrialexpertscall"homogeneousto
BlairAdmitsNeverHavingSentFlowerstoHisWifeBritishPrimeMinisterTonyBlairadmittedonatelevisionprogrammethat
下面你将听到一段有关中美贸易关系的讲话。在冷战结束后的新形势下,两国要不要及如何发展双边关系,是中美两国面临的重大课题。“永久正常贸易关系”的通过表明,在美国,支持发展中美关系的力量占了上风,美国政府、国会、工商企业界和公众的主流都支持以建设性的
中国的对外开放是“引进来”与“走出去”相结合的对外开放。中国政府在鼓励外商来华投资的同时,支持并鼓励有实力的中国企业到海外投资。在中国政府的大力推进下,近年来,中国企业实施“走出去”战略实现了较大跨越。截至2006年底,中国企业在160多个国家和地区投资设
下面你将听到一段有关数字化与互联网发展的讲话。
A、Thankyou.B、Average.C、Quitegood.D、Excellent.D
随机试题
金刚烷胺治疗震颤麻痹的作用机制主要是
肝硬化代偿期较早出现的症状是
患者咽中如有物阻,咯之不出,咽之不下.胸胁满闷。治宜选用
女,70岁。干咳10余天入院,无发热、咯血及呼吸困难。查体:心肺未见异常,双手可见杵状指。胸部X线片示左下肺可见直径约2.6cm的类圆形阴影,其内可见小空洞,边缘不规则。该患者最可能的诊断是
清算、交割、交收中的禁止行为包括()
古代陆上丝绸之路的终点是()。
关于意向,下列说法正确的是()。
通才教育
公安机关的宗旨是()。
"Ifyouhadtoidentify,inoneword,thereasonthehumanracehasnotachieved,andneverwillachieve,itsfullpotential,th
最新回复
(
0
)