首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
93
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How do parents respond to the scheme?
选项
答案
It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents. Their investment would slump in value. In the end these parents were defeated.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
下面你将听到的这段讲话,主题是香港廉政公署和国际刑警组织如何共同合作打击贪污。DistinguishedGuests,LadiesandGentlemen,Firstofall,Iwishtocongratulatethe
上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的印象。这次大会是文艺界经历十年浩劫后的第一次盛会,也是小平同志复出后第一次代表党中央、国务院同广大文艺工作者见面。1960年的第三次文代会后,
我代表中国政府再次确认,中国政府坚定支持北京申请举办2008年国际奥运会的立场。中国政府尊重并赞赏国际奥运会评估团所作的评估报告,我们据此已制定了在北京举办一次出色奥运会的规划。中国政府将信守在北京陈述报告中所作的所有承诺,并将尽一切努力帮助北京实现其承诺
下面你将听到的是一段有关海洋的讲话。海洋是全球生命支持系统的一个不可缺少的组成部分。海洋不仅是自然资源的宝库,同时也是我们人类居住环境的重要调节器。中国政府高度重视海洋的开发和保护,不断加强海洋综合管理,促进海洋产业的协调发展。中国已经
女士们,先生们:早上好!很荣幸参加此次论坛,与各位共同探讨环保与发展方面的问题。气候变化是环境问题,但归根到底是发展问题。这个问题是在发展进程中出现的,应该在可持续发展框架下解决。只有各方在促进自身发展过程中不断提高技术水平,积极建立适应可持续
今晚我要祝福你的俱乐部生日快乐。现在,我自己已经到达生命中的一个阶段,在这个阶段里我记住的是我的生日而不是我几岁了。我想我已经到了所谓的中年。这个阶段,我们往往摄人对我们有益的食物,而不是我们喜欢的食物。我为你们的俱乐部感到自豪,因为它是为我们上了年纪的人
虽然中国出口增长率明年将会下降,良好的投资环境、低价优质的劳动力仍将会继续吸引外国投资者。这是短期因素不能扭转的趋势。但是,实际的直接外国投资用于企业合并和兼并的不到10%,大部分的投资都用于新企业的建立。这意味着中国还有很多空间引导外资融入国营企业的改组
随机试题
国库券通常采取的发行方式是()
流式细胞术检测________、________为诊断阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿提供直接的证据。
患者,男,34岁。间断喘息10年余。发作时服用氨茶碱症状可缓解。为改善患者的症状,应采取的措施有提示:该患者喘息症状突然加重,查体:双肺满布哮鸣音,心率103次/分。
患者,男,65岁。素体气虚,复感外邪,恶寒较重,无发热,鼻塞流涕,头痛无汗,肢体倦怠乏力,咳嗽咳痰无力,舌质淡,苔薄白,脉浮。诊断为气虚感冒。据此判断气的功能减退主要体现在
A.口淡乏味B.口甜黏腻C.口中酸馊D.口中泛酸E.口苦脾胃湿热则()
下列叙述正确的是()。
作为财务管理的目标,企业价值最大化与股东财富最大化相比,其优点是()。
PowerDesigner是SYBASE公司的产品,属于CASE工具,与PowerDesigner是SYBASE公司的产品还有【】、【】和【】。
函数delete(s,i,n)是作用是从字符串s中删除从第i个字符开始的n个字符,请填空。voiddelete(chars[],inti,intn){intj,k,length=0;while(s[length])
Doyouknowanyonewhofeelsawkwardatapartyorhatestobeinacrowdofpeople?They’reprobablyjustshy,butiftheyget
最新回复
(
0
)