首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
98
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How do parents respond to the scheme?
选项
答案
It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents. Their investment would slump in value. In the end these parents were defeated.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
Duringemploymenttheemployeecouldnotuseordisclosethisinformationwithoutbreachingthedutyoffidelity.However,once
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
上个世纪70年代末,我参加了第四次全国文代会,大会上小平同志致辞时获得的长时间的热烈掌声给我留下了极深的印象。这次大会是文艺界经历十年浩劫后的第一次盛会,也是小平同志复出后第一次代表党中央、国务院同广大文艺工作者见面。1960年的第三次文代会后,
北京奥运会不仅将展示新的激动人心的中国文化,也将体现北京独特的个性与技巧。北京也认为,应从奥林匹克运动中通过广泛咨询,得到技术上的建议。在准备这份报告时,我们咨询了来自悉尼、亚特兰大、巴塞罗那的专家。协商和对话是我们工作的原则。//再次申办以来,
地球大气层正在转暖,这种迹象日趋明显,这向人们提出了一个重大问题,即地球变暖在多大程度上应归咎于人类活动,又在多大程度上是自然原因造成的?气候变化科学家们正在寻求答案。经过对全球气候变化的全方位定期科学评估,科学家们断定全球气候受到了“显而易见的人为影响”
中国制造2025中国制造2025是中国政府经过深思熟虑做出的重大战略性决策,是基于中国工业发展水平和未来发展目标所做出的。而很多人对中国制造2025有些误解,认为中国这个政策出台,是不再购买国外的装备。但事实并非如此,企业是自愿决定购买
虽然中国出口增长率明年将会下降,良好的投资环境、低价优质的劳动力仍将会继续吸引外国投资者。这是短期因素不能扭转的趋势。但是,实际的直接外国投资用于企业合并和兼并的不到10%,大部分的投资都用于新企业的建立。这意味着中国还有很多空间引导外资融入国营企业的改组
促进外商投资企业出口便利化,引导外商投资企业充分利用其销售网络扩大出口。鼓励跨国公司在华设立地区总部和研发中心。
随机试题
股票采用代销方式,代销期满后,向投资者出售的股票数量低于拟公开发行股票的数量的多少比例的,为发行失败?()
已知直线运动方程为s=10t+5t2,分别令△t=1,0.1,0.01,求从t=4至t=4+△t,这一段时间内运动的平均速度及t=4时的瞬时速度.
利用仿形法加工直线成形面,当模型尺寸与工尺寸相似时,一般采用()代替铣刀的圆柱表面与模型接触。
甲公司持有乙上市公司30%的股份,现欲继续收购乙公司的股份,遂发出收购要约。甲公司发出的下列收购要约,哪些内容是合法的?
李伍为惯常居所地在甲国的公民,满成为惯常居所地在乙国的公民。甲国不是《保护文学艺术作品伯尔尼公约》缔约国,乙国和中国是该公约的缔约国。关于作品在中国的国民待遇,下列哪些选项是正确的?
检验材料的质量应按()验收。当参加验收各方对工程质量验收意见不一致时,可请()协调处理。
某企业对生产设备进行改良,发生资本化支出共计45万元,被替换旧部件的账面价值为10万元,该设备原价为500万元,已计提折旧300万元,不考虑其他因素。该设备改良后的入账价值为()万元。
下列属于经常项目外汇收支的包括()。
(2015·河北)依法治校是指学校以国家法律、法规、规章和文件规定为依据,完善内部各项管理制度和纪律,使学校管理的各个方面都做到有章可循、有法可依。()
Itwastheworsttragedyinmaritimehistory,sixtimesmoredeadlythantheTitanic.WhentheGermancruiseshipWilhelmGu
最新回复
(
0
)