首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
49
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How do parents respond to the scheme?
选项
答案
It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents. Their investment would slump in value. In the end these parents were defeated.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ifyouareanathlete,strongabdominalmuscleshelpyouensureastrongbackandfreedomfrommjuryduring________upper-bodymo
The2othcenturypoemsuggeststosomethingwehavebeenabletofindnothingabout.
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Scienceandtechnologyisamongthefactorsthathavetakenthehumancivilizationtothelevelitenjoystoday.Everymilestone
Often,capriciousnessisthereasongivenfordoingnothing.Flexibleworkingisanaddedopportunitytoallowstaffattheshar
在中关建交25周年前夕,我应布什总统的邀请正式访问贵国。纽约是我访美的第一站,在这里能与各位新老朋友欢聚一堂,我感到很高兴。在此我要特别感谢美国银行家协会的盛情款待,向多年来为推动中美经贸合作做出积极贡献的各位朋友表示敬意!并通过你们向伟大的美国人民致以诚
主席先生,女士们、先生们:目前,国际形势正处于深刻变化之中。和平与发展仍然是当今时代的主题,总体和平的国际环境为世界经济发展提供了有利条件;科技进步日新月异并孕育着新的重大突破,前所未有地提高了人类认识、把握宏观和微观世界的能力,展现了新的发展
中国制造2025中国制造2025是中国政府经过深思熟虑做出的重大战略性决策,是基于中国工业发展水平和未来发展目标所做出的。而很多人对中国制造2025有些误解,认为中国这个政策出台,是不再购买国外的装备。但事实并非如此,企业是自愿决定购买
随机试题
同等材料、同等厚度的板材对接焊缝和角焊缝是否需要分别进行焊接工艺评定?
患者男,79岁。因“左侧肢体乏力伴言语不清1小时”入院,1小时前患者平静坐着休息时,突觉左手乏力,不能握紧手中杯子,步态不稳,向左侧偏斜,伴口齿不清,无头痛、恶心呕吐,无意识不清,无四肢抽搐,无发热。既往有高血压史十余年,最高时达180/120mmHg,平
胃大部切除术后,若有吻合口梗阻,常呕吐出
下列项目中,不能用现金支付的项目是()。
甲将汽车出租给乙使用,后甲乙约定将该汽车出售给乙,甲乙之间的买卖合同生效时,汽车的所有权转移至乙方。则本案中汽车的交付属于()。
国家知识产权局对李某的药物化合物发明专利申请予以驳回,理由是该化合物相对于对比文件1和2的结合不具备创造性。李某提出复审请求。专利复审委员会经合议组审理后向李某发出复审通知书。下列说法哪些是正确的?
通常,将软件产品从提出、实现、使用维护到停止使用退役的过程称为______。
在考生文件夹下,已有“tTest.txt”文本文件和“samp1.accdb”数据库文件,“samp1.accdb”中已建立表对象“tStud”和“tScore”。试按以下要求,完成表的各种操作:将考生文件夹下文本文件tTest.txt中的数据链接到当
Whoistheintendedaudienceforthistalk?
Thispartistotestyourabilitytodopracticalwriting.Youarerequiredtowriteabusinessletteraccordingtothefollowin
最新回复
(
0
)