首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the pos
admin
2017-03-15
63
问题
Nothing is more terrifying than a mother who scents a threat to her offspring. So it is not surprising that residents of the posher parts of Brighton and Hove, a seaside town with an eclectic social mix, are on the warpath about a change to the way school places are awarded. Threatening e-mails, allegations of gerrymandering and warnings that parents would sue were only part of the reaction to this week’s news that, from 2008, the local authority will allocate places in popular schools by lottery.
Until now, if more children applied to a school than it had room for, those who lived nearest usually won out. As a result, houses next to the most sought-after schools soared in value—entrenching the schools as middle-class ghettoes and increasing their desirability still further. Those who could not afford to live within spitting distance had to go elsewhere. Families living in east Brighton, with no schools nearby, were left to squabble over the crumbs.
Eight secondary schools have been divided into six "catchment areas", two of which have pairs of adjacent schools. If a school cannot accommodate all the children who apply, the council will allocate places randomly, giving preference to those within the catchment area. Some children who would previously have walked to the school around the corner will be bused or driven past children going the opposite way.
The scheme has been two years in the hatching. It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents who had paid top prices for houses next to the schools they liked. They now face not only the possible frustration of their educational hopes for their children but also the prospect that their investment will slump in value.
In the end these parents were defeated by the nifty footwork of Labour councillors determined to push the plan through. The vice-chairman of the committee that voted on the scheme was sacked by the city’s Labour leader just two hours before the vote on February 27th—after she made it clear that she would be voting against. It went through only on the chairman’s casting vote.
Similar battles may soon be fought all over Britain. On February 28th a new admissions code for schools in England and Wales came into force, setting out how a school may decide among the competing claims of children who apply. Religion, proximity and having siblings at the school are all still acceptable, but very popular schools are "encouraged" to use lotteries, as some academies in Britain and charter schools in America now do. They are also urged to consider "fair banding"—working out what mix of abilities their area provides, getting children to take an entrance exam, and then admitting representative numbers from each level of ability.
The admissions code was a sop to left-wingers who hate the government’s broader reforms to free schools from the control of councils, fearing that more segregation will result. Both the code and the Brighton row confirm a depressing aspect of the debate over school choice and standards: an obsession with sharing out places at the best schools rather than creating more of them.
Prospective winners in Brighton are as elated as the losers are despondent. They now have a chance to send their children to schools that they could not previously aspire to. That puts those schools on their mettle: they must prove that it was their teaching and facilities that won good grades, not their middle-class pupils. If they fail, expect to see more children in Brighton going private.
How do parents respond to the scheme?
选项
答案
It was nearly derailed by the bitter opposition of parents. Their investment would slump in value. In the end these parents were defeated.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/BySO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
U.S.jobgrowthwassurprisinglystrongin2018,butdon’texpectthattohappenagainthisyear,witheconomicheadwindsintens
MymotherandOlgahadmetwhileunderwentfertilitytreatmentsatsomesortofexperimentalprograminoneoftheMoscowclinic
DemonstratorsrallyatLosAngelesCityHallduringthefirstWomen’sMarch,heldonJan.21,2017,onedayafterPresidentTrum
下面你将听到的这段讲话,主题是香港廉政公署和国际刑警组织如何共同合作打击贪污。DistinguishedGuests,LadiesandGentlemen,Firstofall,Iwishtocongratulatethe
中国的对外开放是“引进来”与“走出去”相结合的对外开放。中国政府在鼓励外商来华投资的同时,支持并鼓励有实力的中国企业到海外投资。在中国政府的大力推进下,近年来,中国企业实施“走出去”战略实现了较大跨越。截至2006年底,中国企业在160多个国家和地区投资设
1986年全国人大常委会副委员长班禅喇嘛在西康地区大法会上教诲信徒们,要爱惜民族团结,维护祖国统一。在中国,公民的信仰自由受到法律保护。目前全西藏在寺僧尼约有14,000多人,另有800位宗教界人士在各级人大、政协、佛教协会和政府部门中工作。
旅游是一项集观光、娱乐、健身为一体的愉快而美好的活动。旅游业随着时代进步而不断进步。从20世纪中期起,现代旅游业在全世界迅速发展。游客人数不断增长,旅游业规模持续扩大,旅游经济地位显著提升,旅游活动愈益成为各国人民交流文化、增进友谊、扩大交往的重
尊敬的梅莱斯•泽纳维总理阁下,尊敬的各位国家元首和政府首脑阁下,尊敬的非洲联盟委员会主席阿尔法•乌马尔•科纳雷阁下,各位代表团团长、部长和大使阁下,女士们,先生们://我很高兴来到亚的斯亚贝巴,与出席中非合
下面你将听到的是一段有关海洋的讲话。海洋是全球生命支持系统的一个不可缺少的组成部分。海洋不仅是自然资源的宝库,同时也是我们人类居住环境的重要调节器。中国政府高度重视海洋的开发和保护,不断加强海洋综合管理,促进海洋产业的协调发展。中国已经
中国制造2025中国制造2025是中国政府经过深思熟虑做出的重大战略性决策,是基于中国工业发展水平和未来发展目标所做出的。而很多人对中国制造2025有些误解,认为中国这个政策出台,是不再购买国外的装备。但事实并非如此,企业是自愿决定购买
随机试题
A.主动脉B.微动脉C.毛细血管D.微静脉E.腔静脉血流速度最快的是【】
A.胰岛素释放指数升高B.饥饿试验C.低血糖伴ACTH升高,皮质醇下降D.空腹低血糖伴肝功能异常E.餐前有低血糖表现,血糖升高,胰岛素峰值延迟胰岛素瘤
急惊风风热证用方为急惊风湿热疫毒证用方为
A.病原体被清除B.隐性感染C.潜伏性感染D.病原体携带状态E.显性感染感染过程中最常见的表现是
A.百会B.气海、中脘C.脾俞、足三里D.曲池、内庭E.内关、中脘治疗久痢脱肛,应加用的腧穴是
以下哪项是晚期乳癌的特征
某百货大楼是增值税一般纳税人。本月取得商品零售总收入90万元,代销商品手续费8万元;四楼经营快餐城取得收入4万元,五楼开设游艺厅取得收入5万元,其各层的营业额分别核算。计算该企业本月应纳的增值税和营业税。根据上述资料,回答下列问题。该百货大楼增值税计税
2015年2月,我国快递业务量完成8.2亿件;同比增长18.7%;业务收入完成136.0亿元,同比增长22.5%。消费者对快递业务进行的申诉中,有效申诉(确定企业责任的)占总申诉量的97.6%,为消费者挽回经济损失229.8万元。2015年2月,
根据企业所得税法规定,下列保险费不可以税前扣除的是()。
Scotlandisauniqueplace.IthassomeofthemostbeautifulcitiesinEurope,alivingevidenceofasplendidandproudpast.
最新回复
(
0
)